|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Patient had corail and pinnacle implanted in (b)(6) 2022 at another facility, subsequently had spinal fusion and has dislocated twice and also shown signs of infection around the joint and distal femoral implant.This required revision surgery to remove the implant and replace with corail revision stem and cemented bimentum cup.Patient status/ outcome / consequences: yes, patient consequence description/was there a clinical outcome experienced by the patient (infection, inflammation, etc.)?: infection, was other medical intervention (e.G.X-rays, additional procedures, prescriptions, otc, revision) required: yes, if yes, describe: xrays, revision surgery, is the patient part of a clinical study: no, (b)(4).Device property of: none, device in possession of: none, (b)(4).Device property of: none, device in possession of: none, (b)(4).Device property of: none, device in possession of: none.By checking this box i certify that all information that are known/available has been disclosed.If any new information will be made available, the additional information will be submitted through cst.: true.
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary : no device associated with this report was received for examination.The information received will be retained for potential series investigations if triggered by trend analysis, post market surveillance, or other events within the quality system.Depuy considers the investigation closed.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed and the investigation will be re-opened as necessary.Device history lot : the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.
|