| Model Number |
3425-1300S |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Break (1069); Fracture (1260)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Failure of Implant (1924)
|
| Date of Event |
03/28/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Based on the available information the device will not be returned therefore an evaluation of the device cannot be performed.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report.H3 other text : device disposition unknown.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported: "breakage of the nail.A revision will probably have to be performed.".
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported: "breakage of the nail.A revision will probably have to be performed.".
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Please note correction to d3 (manufacturer entity) and d9/h3.The reported event could be confirmed, since the product was returned for evaluation and matches the alleged failure mode.The device inspection revealed the following: the received nail is completely broken in the webs of the proximal lag screw hole.Significant drill marks, with chamfer-like material removal, were observed on the lateral side of the proximal and distal segment of the broken nail and progressing toward the medial side.The mis-drilling had extended along the posterior web.The drill marks were generated by a deviated lag screw step drill which had created the starting point of the fracture (notching effect) at the lateral edge due to over lying stresses.The lag screw bearing point on the medial side at the distal end shows deformation which is from the high compressive load.This deformation indicates that the nail was exposed to continuous high loads over a longer period of time.The breakage pattern resembles a fatigue breakage of the nail.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.Based on the above investigation and available information, the root cause of the failure is most likely user -related.The appearance of mis-drilling marks indicates that the nail was damaged intra-operatively which may have led to the weakening of the nail initially.Along with that the simultaneous overloading on the whole construct ultimately led to the breakage of the nail in a fatigue manner.If any further information is provided, the complaint report will be updated.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|