• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ELI LILLY AND COMPANY HUMAPEN ERGO II; FOR TREATMENT PURPOSES

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ELI LILLY AND COMPANY HUMAPEN ERGO II; FOR TREATMENT PURPOSES Back to Search Results
Model Number MS9557
Device Problems Failure to Deliver (2338); Mechanical Jam (2983); Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Hyperglycemia (1905)
Event Date 04/01/2023
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Lilly case id: (b)(4).This report is associated with product complaint: (b)(4).This spontaneous device only case, reported by a consumer who contacted the company to report adverse events and a product complaint (pc), concerns a 53-year-old asian male patient of han origin.Medical history and concomitant medications were none.The patient began taking an unspecified insulin (from eli lilly) via a reusable device, humapen ergo ii, 20 units in the morning and 12-13 in the evening; twice a day, by subcutaneous route, for treatment of type i diabetes mellitus, beginning from 2005.On an unspecified date in (b)(6) 2023 the humapen ergo ii injection button was pushed down to the end directly without clicking sounds.Due to this malfunction the pen could not push insulin out.The patient found that his blood glucose was high in the body examination on (b)(6) 2023.It was found that the pre-prandial blood glucose was 21.0-22.0 (unit not provided), the postprandial blood glucose was 18.0-19.0 and 15.0-16.0 (pc number:(b)(4)/ lot number: 1008d01).Later he was hospitalized for regulating blood glucose.Also it was found his blood pressure was on the high side in the examination.The bottom number(diastolic) was 90-100, and the top (systolic) was 142 (unit not provided) and the blood lipid was a little higher.Events were resolving.Treatment measures was not provided.Status of the unspecified insulin was ongoing.Follow up was not possible as the reporter was not willing to be followed up via phone and treating physician name and address was not provided.The user of the suspect device and training status of user not provided.The general device duration of use and the suspect device duration of use was not provided.Action taken with suspect device was not provided but it was available for return.The reporting consumer did not know relatedness for the events with unspecified insulin, and related event of blood glucose increased with humapen ergo ii.Edit 26apr2023: updated medwatch and european and canadian (eu/ca) fields for expedited device reporting.No new information added.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If device is returned, evaluation will be performed to determine if a malfunction has occurred.This is an initial report.A follow-up report will be submitted when the final evaluation is completed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
B.5.Narrative field: new, updated and corrected information is referenced within the update statements in b.5.Please refer to update statement dated 01may2023 in the b.5.Field.No further follow-up is planned.Evaluation summary: a male patient reported that his humapen ergo ii device "was pushed down to the end directly without clicking sounds and the humapen could not push insulin out." the patient experienced increased blood glucose.The investigation of the returned device (batch 1008d01, manufactured august 2010) found the pen body was cracked and the soft touch was peeled off, with evidence of excessive force observed for both issues.However, the device met functional requirements and met dose accuracy and glide (injection) force specifications.No malfunction was identified.Based on the date the device was manufactured (august 2010), the device was likely beyond the recommended use life.The core instructions for use state the humapen ergo ii has been designed to be used for up to 3 years after first use.There is evidence of improper use.The damage to the device is consistent with damage while in the field and the user likely used the device beyond its recommended use period.These misuses are not likely relevant to the event of increased blood glucose since the device met functional requirements and met dose accuracy and glide (injection) force specifications.
 
Event Description
Lilly case id: (b)(4).This report is associated with product complaint: (b)(4).This spontaneous device only case, reported by a consumer who contacted the company to report adverse events and a product complaint (pc), concerns a 53-year-old asian male patient of han origin.Medical history and concomitant medications were none.The patient began taking an unspecified insulin (from eli lilly) via a reusable device, humapen ergo ii, 20 units in the morning and 12-13 in the evening; twice a day, by subcutaneous route, for treatment of type i diabetes mellitus, beginning from 2005.On an unspecified date in (b)(6) 2023 the humapen ergo ii injection button was pushed down to the end directly without clicking sounds.Due to this malfunction the humapen could not push insulin out.The patient found that his blood glucose was high in the body examination on (b)(6) 2023.It was found that the pre-prandial blood glucose was 21.0-22.0 (unit not provided), the postprandial blood glucose was 18.0-19.0 and 15.0-16.0 (pc number: (b)(4)/ lot number: 1008d01).Later he was hospitalized for regulating blood glucose.Also it was found his blood pressure was on the high side in the examination.The bottom number(diastolic) was 90-100, and the top (systolic) was 142 (unit not provided) and the blood lipid was a little higher.Events were resolving.Treatment measures was not provided.Status of the unspecified insulin was ongoing.Follow up was not possible as the reporter was not willing to be followed up via phone and treating physician name and address was not provided.The user of the suspect device and training status of user not provided.The device was used beyond the recommendation.Action taken with suspect device was not provided.The device was returned to manufacturer on 10apr2023 and device met functional requirements.The reporting consumer did not know relatedness for the events with unspecified insulin, and related event of blood glucose increased with humapen ergo ii.Edit 26apr2023: updated medwatch and european and canadian (eu/ca) fields for expedited device reporting.No new information added.Update 01may2023: additional information received on 25apr2023 from the global product complaint database.Entered device specific safety summary (dsss) for humapen ergo ii device associated with (b)(4), lot 1008d01.Updated the medwatch fields/ european and canadian (eu/ca) device information and device return status was updated as returned to manufacturer and return date was updated.Added date of manufacturer for the device, device malfunction was updated from unknown to no and device met functional requirements.Also, improper use or storage was updated from no to yes.Corresponding fields and narrative updated accordingly.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HUMAPEN ERGO II
Type of Device
FOR TREATMENT PURPOSES
Manufacturer (Section D)
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
lilly corporate center
indianapolis
Manufacturer (Section G)
TECH GROUP NORTH AMERICA INC. DBA WEST
640 south rockford drive
tempe 85281
Manufacturer Contact
chris davis
lilly corporate center
indianapolis 46285
3174334585
MDR Report Key16836465
MDR Text Key314221541
Report Number1819470-2023-00030
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FMF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
K151686
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Consumer
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/01/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/28/2023
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Other
Device Model NumberMS9557
Device Lot Number1008D01
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Manufacturer Received04/25/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/31/2010
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
Patient Age53 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight73 KG
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceAsian
-
-