|
Section d6a: if implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was not implanted.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was not implanted, hence not explanted.Section h3-other (81): the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.An attempt has been made to obtain missing information; however, no definitive response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
|
Section d9.Device available for evaluation? yes.Returned to manufacturer on: jun 9, 2023.Section h3.Device evaluated manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: product evaluation was performed under magnification.The complaint device presented with the lens inside the cartridge.The lead haptic was observed to be unfolded.The device assembly was inspected and no issues were identified.The lens was removed and presented with damage consistent with being folded in a cartridge.The complaint issue dc-haptic damaged was not confirmed during product evaluation.The other observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.As per complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation the complaint issue reported could not be confirmed and no product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|