|
Other text: additional information is provided in d.10., h.2., h.3., and h.6.One (1) sample was received for evaluation without its original packaging, inside a plastic bag in decontaminated conditions.During the visual inspection it is observed unit received with diaphragm ruptured and most of the dialectric gel missing from the transducer.The number 9 is written on the back of the transducer.The complaint is confirmed.Manual electrical continuity tested on unit and met input and output specifications.Due to age unable to determine amount of use prior to diaphragm failure.Possible cause was diaphragm was damaged by insertion of the mating transducer cartridge.A device history record (dhr) review was not conducted, based upon review of the information provided by the customer, as it does not indicate a problem with the initial manufacture or prior repair of the device.For all enquiries or follow-up questions related to the record, do not use (b)(6) located in sections g.1., please direct those to the following: (b)(6).
|