• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) BD PHOENIX¿ AUTOMATED MICROBIOLOGY SYSTEM; SEE H.10

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS) BD PHOENIX¿ AUTOMATED MICROBIOLOGY SYSTEM; SEE H.10 Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 448100
Medical Device Problem Code Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 04/11/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
D.3 common device name: system, test, automated antimicrobial susceptibility, short incubation (b)(6).H.3.A device evaluation is anticipated, but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that while using the bd phoenix¿ automated microbiology system that there was false resistance.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: client frequently reports carbapenem resistance.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation summary: a failure for false resistance was reported on a phoenix 100 instrument (p/n 448100, s/n (b)(6) ).The customer reported ongoing issues with isolates having false carbapenm resistance.No instrument errors were reported and no additional information was provided by the customer.The root cause of the failure is unknown, this is an unconfirmed failure of a bd product.No samples were expected to be received as part of this complaint, and therefore no samples were returned and no returned material investigation could occur.Dhr review is not required for this complaint as this complaint does not allege an early life failure or failure at installation and the configuration has changed since release from manufacturing due to service repairs/pms.Service history for this instrument was reviewed and revealed no previous complaints related to this failure mode.Complaints for results are within statistical control for the month of april 2023.The upper control limit was not breached.Quality will continue to monitor the results complaints for phoenix 100 instruments.No new risks or hazards, or changes to existing risks/hazards, were identified as a result of this complaint.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that while using the bd phoenix¿ automated microbiology system that there was false resistance.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: client frequently reports carbapenem resistance.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BD PHOENIX¿ AUTOMATED MICROBIOLOGY SYSTEM
Common Device Name
SEE H.10
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS)
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
Manufacturer (Section G)
BECTON, DICKINSON & CO. (SPARKS)
7 loveton circle
sparks MD 21152
Manufacturer Contact
phillip emmert
5859 farinon drive
san antonio, TX 78249
8448235433
MDR Report Key16876786
Report Number1119779-2023-00528
Device Sequence Number15269454
Product Code LON
UDI-Device Identifier00382904481001
UDI-Public0100382904481001
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryBR
PMA/510(K) Number
K020321
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 07/17/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Other
Device Catalogue Number448100
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/11/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer07/17/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/05/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date07/20/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/27/2014
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-