• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS ELECSYS CEA ASSAY; SYSTEM, TEST, CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS ELECSYS CEA ASSAY; SYSTEM, TEST, CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 04491777160
Medical Device Problem Code Low Test Results (2458)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 04/04/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
The initial reporter received questionable elecsys cea assay, and several other assay results from an unspecified number of patient samples tested on the cobas 6000 e601 (ul) v, with serial number (b)(4).The reporter stated, that the qc was out of range and multiple patient results were flagged.The reporter then ran an assay profile of the evening shift and noted, that the qc for cea was out of range twice.The procell and cleancell were then replaced.The qc was rerun with acceptable results.The reporter pulled an interface report and noticed several low results on multiple assays.The reporter was able to provide two examples of questionable results.The initial results were reported outside of the laboratory.Sample 1: on (b)(6) 2023, the initial result using an aliquoted sample was 63.46 ng/ml.On (b)(6) 2023, the repeat result using the primary tube (after service) was 118.9 ng/ml.Sample 2: the initial result was 0.5 ng/ml.The repeat result was 5.66 ng/ml.The repeat results were deemed correct. .
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The field service engineer inspected the module and could not find the cause of the event.He tightened the sipper probes.And the customer used the module without any issues.The last calibration performed on 31-mar-2023 was within specifications.Qc 1 was acceptable on the date of the event and after the repeat.Qc 3 had some out-of-range (high) results.The investigation is ongoing.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The alarm trace contained multiple "abnormal aspiration" alarms.This can be an indicator of poor sample quality.Based on the information provided, the cause of the event could not be determined.The investigation did not identify a product problem.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ELECSYS CEA ASSAY
Common Device Name
SYSTEM, TEST, CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN
Manufacturer (Section D)
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS
9115 hague road
indianapolis IN 46250 0457
Manufacturer (Section G)
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS GMBH
sandhoferstrasse 116
na
mannheim (baden-wurttemberg) 68305
GM   68305
Manufacturer Contact
amy nelson
9115 hague road
na
indianapolis, IN 46250
3174767531
MDR Report Key16877246
Report Number1823260-2023-01519
Device Sequence Number5730718
Product Code DHX
UDI-Device Identifier04015630938919
UDI-Public04015630938919
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K980887
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/26/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number04491777160
Device Lot Number627736
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/07/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/15/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/05/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/26/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age54 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-