• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS IOL; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number ZCB00
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Capsular Bag Tear (2639)
Date of Event 08/29/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a2, a4, a5: unknown/ not provided.Asku.Section d6a: if implanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced during the same procedure.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as lens was removed/replaced during the same procedure.Section h3-other (81): the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Section h6: health effect impact code: 4625 (pt-unplanned vitrectomy, pt-sutures).An attempt has been made to obtain missing information; however, no definitive response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that an intraocular lens (iol) was fully inserted and removed during the same procedure due to posterior rent noted after insertion.Unplanned vitrectomy and sutures performed.Suspect iol was replaced with a non-johnson and johnson iol.The outcome did not significantly interfere with patient's activities of daily life and the patient has recovered.No other information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation: product evaluation was performed under magnification.The complaint lens was received cut in half.The lens was cleaned and presented with no issues that would have contributed to the complaint event.The complaint issues were not confirmed.The other observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing or design issue.As per complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation the complaint issue reported could not be confirmed and no product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS IOL
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key16879927
Report Number3012236936-2023-01102
Device Sequence Number5822089
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474531642
UDI-Public(01)05050474531642(17)260506
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateKS
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Distributor
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 07/12/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/06/2026
Device Model NumberZCB00
Device Catalogue NumberZCB0000165
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/24/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer07/09/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/05/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date07/12/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/06/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-