|
Per rep - (b)(6) 2023 - the stent was deployed properly.Everything went well.When they were removing the delivery catheter, the inside piece of the catheter got stuck on the wire right inside of the sheath hub.They were pulling on the catheter and it would not detach from the wire.They flushed the side port and the back port again but that did not help.They had to use excessive force to get the catheter to detach from the wire.The procedure was completed fine with the device in question.The rep believes that the problem was caused by an inner portion of the catheter detaching from the outer portion.Per pr (b)(4) a 8fr terumo sheath was used.As per ifu0091, the recommended access sheath is 7fr.6.3.1.1 did any unintended section of the device remain inside the patient¿s body? -no ¿ if yes, please describe.6.3.1.2 was the patient hospitalized or was there prolonged hospitalization due to this occurrence? -no 6.3.1.3 did the patient require any additional procedures due to this occurrence? -no ¿ if yes, please describe.6.3.1.4 did the product cause or contribute to the need for additional procedures? -no ¿ if yes, please specify additional procedures and provide details.6.3.1.5 has the complainant reported any adverse effects on the patient due to this occurrence? -no 6.3.1.6 has the complainant reported that the product caused or contributed to the adverse effects? -no ¿ please specify adverse effects and provide details.Prefix zvt7 3.91 are images of the device or procedure available? n/a, yes, no -of the device 3.92 did the patient have pre-existing conditions? n/a, yes, no -yes ¿ if yes, please specify: -dvt, 2 weks post-partum 3.93 please describe the native state of the vessel (i.E.Was the anatomy tortuous? -just an acute clot was the vessel fibrotic?) n/a, tortuous, calcified, fibrotic, other -no ¿ if other, please specify: -just an acute clot 3.94 was a stent previously placed during previous procedures? n/a, yes, no -no 3.95 was the device used percutaneously? n/a, yes, no -yes 3.96 where on the patient was the percutaneous access site? -popliteal, left leg 3.97 was the access site jugular or femoral? n/a, jugular, femoral other -other ¿ if other, please specify: -popliteal, patient was prone 3.98 what disease pathology was being treated? may thurner, acute or chronic obstruction, restenosis, other? -may thurner ¿ if other, please specify -n/a 3.99 was the lesion approached via contralateral or ipsilateral? n/a, contralateral, ipsilateral -ipsilateral 3.100 was pre-dilation performed ahead of placement of the stent? n/a, yes, no -no 3.101 what was the target location for the stent? -common iliac vein 3.102 details of access sheath used (name, fr size, length)? -8 fr short terumo sheath 3.103 was the device flushed through both flushing ports before the procedure, as per ifu? n/a, yes, no -yes 3.104 details of the wire guide used (name, diameter, hyrdophyllic)? -boston scientific amplatz super stiff wire.035, not hydrophllic 3.105 was resistance encountered when advancing the wire guide to the target location? n/a, yes, no -no 3.106 was resistance encountered when advancing the delivery system to the target location? n/a, yes, no -no 3.107 if resistance was met, how did the physician address this? -n/a 3.108 did the tip of the delivery system cross the target location? n/a, yes, no -yes 3.109 did the user pull the handle towards the hub during deployment, per ifu? n/a, yes, no -yes 3.110 did the user push the hub during deployment? n/a, yes, no -no 3.111 did the user remove slack in the delivery system before deployment, per ifu? n/a, yes, no -yes 3.112 was the stent deployed smoothly / without resistance? n/a, yes, no -yes 3.113 was the stent fully deployed in the patient? n/a, yes, no -yes 3.114 was the stent fully deployed before removing the delivery system from the patient? n/a, yes, no -yes 3.115 was post dilation performed after the placement of the stent? n/a, yes, no -yes 3.116 was the delivery system damaged/kinked/twisted during deployment? n/a, yes, no -no 3.117 what intervention (if any) was required? -none 3.118 was the secondary intervention performed during the same procedure as the device failure or was it scheduled for another day? n/a, same procedure, another day -n/a 3.119 were any other defects (other than the complaint issue) observed on the delivery system prior to return (e.G.Kink)? n/a, yes, no -no ¿ please specify if yes.
|