• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ALTRUA 60; PACEMAKER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ALTRUA 60; PACEMAKER Back to Search Results
Model Number S602
Medical Device Problem Codes Over-Sensing (1438); Pacing Problem (1439)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Asystole (4442)
Date of Event 04/24/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during explant procedure, the physician was using electrocautery and this pacemaker exhibited pacing inhibition for more than two seconds.Technical services (ts) discussed it could be the device sensed extra energy and reacted to prevent energy from being delivered in an unintended location.This pacemaker was successfully explanted due to normal battery depletion and replaced.No adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The returned device was thoroughly inspected and analyzed upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory.Visual examination of the device header and case noted no anomalies.Dimensional analysis of the header was completed.Each port measured as expected.The device was then exposed to simulated heart load conditions, and the pacing, and sensing functions were tested.Impedance testing was completed, and all measurements were within normal limits.The device operated appropriately with no interruptions in therapy output at the returned programmed settings.A series of electrical tests was also performed, and again, normal device function was observed.Analysis did not identify any device characteristics that would have caused or contributed to the reported clinical observations.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during explant procedure, the physician was using electrocautery and this pacemaker exhibited pacing inhibition for more than two seconds.Technical services (ts) discussed it could be the device sensed extra energy and reacted to prevent energy from being delivered in an unintended location.This pacemaker was successfully explanted due to normal battery depletion and replaced.No adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ALTRUA 60
Common Device Name
PACEMAKER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
cashel road
clonmel
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
timothy degroot
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul, MN 55112
6515826168
MDR Report Key16891157
Report Number2124215-2023-22389
Device Sequence Number5956441
Product Code LWP
UDI-Device Identifier00802526484476
UDI-Public00802526484476
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateVA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
N970003/S096
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2009
Device Explanted Year2023
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 11/20/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date02/19/2011
Device Model NumberS602
Device Catalogue NumberS602
Device Lot Number583974
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/24/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer11/16/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/08/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date11/20/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/20/2009
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age83 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-