|
|
| Model Number |
212723 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: udi: (b)(4).The lot number was unknown.D4, g1, h4: the lot number was unknown; therefore, the expiration date, manufacturing site name and device manufacture date were unknown.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported by a healthcare professional in united kingdom that during an unknown procedure on an unknown date, a bioknotless br anchor w/panacryl device was used.According to the report, following a review of imaging, it was confirmed that there were metal fragment tips from the introducer that remained in the patient.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial "medwatch", a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary: the condition reported in this complaint is consistent with the improper insertion of the inserter tip, it is breaking and leaving the broken piece of the inserter inside the patient.It was determined during the investigation of this issue that the inserter tip is breaking when the anchor is inserted off axis due to a misuse.The inserter tip breaking of the bioknotless insertion tip is attributed to a misuse, this issue is already being addresses by depuy quality system thru escalation and capa process.Depuy synthes mitek will continue to monitor additional complaint information for potential safety signals through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.A field action was released, and it has been handling thru depuy quality system.Depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.Device history review: given that lot number was not provided, the manufacturing record evaluation (mre) review cannot be performed.If the lot number becomes available, the mre review will be performed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|