|
It was reported that after a tka surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2018, the post of the lgn ps high flex xlpe sz 5-6 10mm broke while he was doing physiotherapy.Due to this, a revision surgery had to be performed on (b)(6) 2023.Current health status of the patient is unknown.No further details available at this moment.
|
|
H3, h6: the associated device was returned and evaluated.A visual inspection of the returned device reveals the post fractured off.The broken post was returned.The visual also reveals scratches, burrs and discoloration on the insert.The device shows signs of wear.The knee insert post deformation and/or fracture may have been due to repeated posterior contact of the femoral cam on the post combined with excessive posterior to anterior shear force during activity.However, this could not be isolated as the root cause for this particular failure mode.Some additional factors that could have contributed to the reported event include patient anatomy, abnormal loading of limb and/or traumatic injury.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.The clinical/medical evaluation concluded that this case reports a revision tka surgery due to the post lgn ps high flex xlpe sz 5-6 10mm breaking while the patient was doing physiotherapy.As of the date of this medical investigation, the requested clinical documentation has not been provided for evaluation.It has been communicated via e-mail that further information is not available.Therefore, there were no clinical factors found which would have contributed to the reported event.The patient impact beyond the revision surgery could not be determined.No further clinical assessment can be rendered at this time.Should additional clinical documentation become available in the future, the clinical/medical task may be re-evaluated.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.At this time, we do not have reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.Assessment of historical escalated cases concluded that there are no prior actions related to this device and failure mode.A review of instruction for use for knee systems revealed in the warnings and precautions that the implant can break or become damaged as a result of strenuous activity or trauma.The patient should be warned that the device does not replace normal healthy bone.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|