|
Manufacturer's ref# sf (b)(4).Technical investigation concluded: a device history record review have been completed.No deviation or changes were found during manufacturing of the device.The clinical investigation concluded: case involves dome stuck in left ear.The user has been in contact with authorized medical practitioners, who removed the dome from the ear.No irritation or puncture of tympanic membrane.User tolerated procedure well.During the medical practitioner visit the user stated he experienced mild ear pain and some rash 1-4 weeks prior to event.The user tried ear drops for the symptoms.The user has a known history of chronic earinfection.Clinical conclusion is that the detached dome has not caused harm to the patient and no medical treatment was prescribed for this event.The clinical evaluation for the device family does evaluate domes coming loose in the ear canal.This is identified in the risk analysis and mitigated through device design by ensuring a sufficient pull force (compliance with iec 60601-2-66).The user guide states to contact the hcp if a foreign object or wax is in the ear canal to reduce the potential risk of harm as far as possible.There are no new clinical aspects (e.G., unforeseen use or clinical conditions) discovered from this event.Therefore, it is concluded that the current clinical evaluation and risk/benefit conclusions herein are sufficient.Risk register conclusion reference: the residual risk after the risk control measure(s) is acceptable.No new hazardous situations revealed and no need to update the risk register.Device has not been returned.The user guide indicates incorrect dome replacement can result in a dome being left in your ear when you remove the hearing aid.Manufacturer's investigation is final.This is a combined (initial and final) report.
|
|
(b)(6) 2023 (b)(6) 2023 an email was received from user: about two weeks ago, the ear mold on my disconnected and became stuck in my ear.The issues was unknown for about a week.A significant ear infection occurred.To remove the plastic ear mold, a doctor's visit was required.The authorized medical practitioners removed the dome from the ear.No irritation or puncture of tympanic membrane.User tolerated procedure well.During the medical practitioner visit the user stated he experienced mild ear pain and some rash 1-4 weeks prior to event.The user tried ear drops for the symptoms.The user has a known history of chronic ear infection.Hearing aids were professionally reviewed and cleaned by costco audiology about 2 months ago.Device history: purchased 1.26.2018/ sn: (b)(4).Hearing aid is used with sports lock device has never been in for any service to our facility.Contact store for service history: (b)(6) 2020, complaint left aid weak, clean & check, (b)(6) 2021, clean & check, (b)(6) 2022 clean and check, (b)(6) 2022 clean and check, replaced dome, filter and sport lock.Receiver has never been replaced.Will follow up with hearing care provider to see if custom earmold is an option.
|