| Model Number |
142122-03 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Pain (1994); Restenosis (4576)
|
| Date of Event |
07/07/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
There was no reported device malfunction and the device was not returned for analysis.A review has been performed of the manufacturing certificate of conformance associated with this lot.There were no non-conformances or deviations which could be associated with this event.Based on the case information and related record review, a conclusive cause for the reported patient effects, and the relationship to the product, if any, cannot be determined.The reported patient effect of restenosis leading to intervention and leg pain/claudication are listed in the biomimics 3d instructions for use and are known patient effect of peripheral stenting procedures.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture or labelling of the device.If further information regarding this event becomes available, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The patient was treated as part of the mimics 3d usa post-market observational study.On the (b)(6)2022, the patient was implanted with one biomimics 3d (bm3d) stent, a 7.0 x 60mm stent which was used to treat a denovo lesion of the superficial femoral artery (sfa) distal third to proximal popliteal in the left leg.A contralateral approach was used and the lesion was prepared using atherectomy.The treated segment was also post dilated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta) balloon.The site reported that on (b)(6)2022, a restenosis of treated segment (target lesion) was identified.It was reported as not related to the device and not related to the procedure but due to a worsening pre-existing condition.It was reported as target lesion related and required percutaneous intervention.The patient had a left leg extremity angiogram and intervention for worsening claudication that involved laser atherectomy and pta/plain old balloon angioplasty (poba) of the proximal third of the sfa to proximal popliteal (pop) on the (b)(6)2022.It was reported as a target lesion revascularisation (tlr) and target vessel revascularisation (tvr).The patient outcome was reported as resolved/recovered and the device remains implanted.It was reviewed by veryan and considered possibly related to the device.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The patient was treated as part of the mimics 3d usa post-market observational study.On the (b)(6) 2022, the patient was implanted with one biomimics 3d (bm3d) stent, a 7.0 x 60 mm stent which was used to treat a denovo lesion of the superficial femoral artery (sfa) distal third to proximal popliteal in the left leg.A contralateral approach was used and the lesion was prepared using atherectomy.The treated segment was also post dilated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta) balloon.The site reported that on (b)(6) 2022, a restenosis of treated segment (target lesion) was identified.It was reported as not related to the device and not related to the procedure but due to a worsening pre-existing condition.It was reported as target lesion related and required percutaneous intervention.The patient had claudication and elevated velocities within the sfa stent shown on duplex ultrasound (dus) on (b)(6) 2022.A left lower extremity (lle) angiogram and intervention that involved laser atherectomy and pta/standard balloon angioplasty of the proximal third of the sfa to the tibial peroneal trunk (tpt) on the (b)(6) 2022.It was reported as a target lesion revascularisation (tlr) and target vessel revascularisation (tvr).The patient outcome was reported as resolved/recovered and the device remains implanted.It was reviewed by veryan and considered possibly related to the device.Additional information received on 24-apr-24 following site updates included a change to the date of onset from (b)(6) 2022 to (b)(6) 2022, an update to the distal segment treated at the intervention was made to reflect a change from the proximal popliteal to the tpt as well as details of the dus performed on (b)(6) 2022.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
There was no reported device malfunction and the device was not returned for analysis.A review has been performed of the manufacturing certificate of conformance associated with this lot.There were no non-conformances or deviations which could be associated with this event.Based on the case information and related record review, a conclusive cause for the reported patient effects, and the relationship to the product, if any, cannot be determined.The reported patient effects of restenosis leading to intervention and leg pain/claudication are listed in the biomimics 3d instructions for use and are known patient effects of peripheral stenting procedures.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture or labelling of the device.If further information regarding this event becomes available, a follow-up report will be submitted.Section b.3.Was updated with the date of onset (b)(6) 2022, section b.5.Was updated to reflect this and the change to the distal segment treated in the intervention and additional information on the event, section b.7.Was corrected to reflect the date of the intervention in the procedure from (b)(6) 2021 to (b)(6) 2021, sections d.3.And g.1.Were updated to reflect the updated veryan address details, sections g.6.And h.2.Were updated to reflect the type of report (follow-up 01) and the reason and section h.11.Was updated to reflect the sections changed in this report.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|