| Model Number |
1012580-26 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Failure to Advance (2524); Deformation Due to Compressive Stress (2889)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
04/18/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a perforation at the mid left anterior descending artery (lad).Patient presented with st-segment elevation myocardial infraction (stemi) and the lad was ballooned; however without distal flow.The lesion was stented with a non-abbott stent and subsequently on pursuing low pressure inflation in the mid to distal lad and it was noted the patient developed a coronary perforation.A 2.80x26mm graftmaster covered stent failed to cross due to resistance with anatomy and the tip became bent.Two graftmasters (2.8x16mm, 3.5x26mm) were implanted next successfully sealing the area of the perforation the devices covered.Another two graftmasters were implanted (3.5x16mm, 4.0x26mm) however, these failed to seal.A drop in blood pressure was noted pericardiocentesis was pursued with placement of a pigtail catheter with improvement in blood pressure.Balloon dilatation was performed with unspecified non-abbott balloons that sealed the perforation and no significant pericardial effusion was noted.There was no adverse patient sequela and no clinically significant delay in the procedure reported.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Manufacturer's investigation is still pending at this time.Results and conclusions will be provided in the final report.The additional graftmaster devices referenced in b5 are filed under separate medwatch report numbers.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history did not indicate a lot specific quality issue.The reported difficulties appear to be related to the operational context of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|