|
|
| Model Number |
G56553 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
04/25/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported, during an angiogram of the left leg, a cxi support catheter separated at the hub.Access was obtained in the right common femoral artery to target the left anterior tibial artery.The fitting was washed/wiped down "per the ifu".The anatomy was reportedly calcified, and resistance was encountered upon insertion of the device, which was unable to cross the difficult lesion.Towards the "middle to end" of the procedure, when the complaint device was inside of an unspecified 0.035-inch cxi catheter, over a 0.018-inch wire, the catheter separated at the hub.The hub was outside of the patient at the time of separation, so the catheter was pulled from the patient, maintaining wire access.The 0.035-inch cxi was still in the patient, and the procedure was successfully completed with another device of the same type.The fitting of the complaint device was reportedly not connected to any other device, and a power injector was not used.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Upon return and initial evaluation of the device, the catheter material was separated, just below the hub.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
E1: customer name and address= address line 2: (b)(6).E3: occupation = or director.H3: device evaluated by mfg = other (81) - device evaluation has begun; however, a conclusion is not yet available.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.Summary of event: as reported, during an angiogram of the left leg, a cxi support catheter separated at the hub.Access was obtained in the right common femoral artery to target the left anterior tibial artery.The fitting was washed/wiped down "per the ifu".The anatomy was reportedly calcified, and resistance was encountered upon insertion of the device, which was unable to cross the difficult lesion.Towards the "middle to end" of the procedure, when the complaint device was inside of an unspecified 0.035-inch cxi catheter, over a 0.018-inch wire, the catheter separated at the hub.The hub was outside of the patient at the time of separation, so the catheter was pulled from the patient, maintaining wire access.The 0.035-inch cxi was still in the patient, and the procedure was successfully completed with another device of the same type.The fitting of the complaint device was reportedly not connected to any other device, and a power injector was not used.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient¿s body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Upon return and initial evaluation of the device, the catheter material was separated, just below the hub.Investigation evaluation: reviews of the compliant history, device history record, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions and quality control procedures were conducted during the investigation.A visual inspection of the complaint device was also conducted.The complaint device was returned to cook for investigation.The shaft of the catheter was separated just below the hub.Some tubing material was left in the hub.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.No related non-conformances were found, and there have been no other reported complaints for this lot number.The instructions for use precautions "catheter manipulation should only occur under fluoroscopy.The catheter should not be advanced into a vessel having a reference vessel diameter smaller than the catheter outer diameter.The catheter should not be advanced through an area of resistance unless the source of resistance is identified by fluoroscopy and appropriate steps are taken to reduce or remove the obstruction." the information provided upon review of the returned device, dmr, dhr, and ifu suggests that there is evidence the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of non-conforming devices in-house or in the field.Cook has concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.Based on the available information and results of the investigation, cook has concluded a component failure without a manufacturing or design deficiency contributed to this event.However, it is possible that the catheter separated due to manipulation while trying to pass the difficult, calcified anatomy.The appropriate personnel have been notified and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is required.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No additional information regarding the patient and/or event has been received since the previous medwatch report was sent.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|