• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBY2C1660
Medical Device Problem Code Premature Separation (4045)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 04/21/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been returned and the investigation results are pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.H3 other text : placeholder.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the mesenteric artery using a ruby coil and a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern).It should be noted that the patient''s anatomy was tortuous.During the procedure, the physician advanced the ruby coil into the target location and did not like how it was forming in the vessel.Therefore, the physician decided to retract the ruby coil.Upon retraction, the ruby coil unintentionally detached partially in the lantern and partially in the vessel.Therefore, the physician used a snare device and removed the ruby coil.The procedure was completed using a new ruby coil and the same lantern.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned ruby coil confirmed that the embolization coil was detached.Evaluation revealed that the sr component was fractured, and the proximal constraint sphere was not present.If the ruby coil is retracted against resistance, damage such as this may occur.Further evaluation revealed that the embolization coil was unraveled.If the sr component fractures, the embolization coil will likely begin to unravel.The pusher assembly was not returned for evaluation.Penumbra products are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBY COIL
Common Device Name
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key16925103
Report Number3005168196-2023-00226
Device Sequence Number6910487
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548019253
UDI-Public814548019253
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTN
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K173614
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/16/2023
Report Date (Section F) 01/01/2005
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRBY2C1660
Device Lot NumberC00004883
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/25/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/21/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/05/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/12/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/16/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/25/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age76 YR
Patient SexFemale
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
-
-