• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD ACETLR CUP HAP 56MM W/ IMPTR; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD ACETLR CUP HAP 56MM W/ IMPTR; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING Back to Search Results
Model Number 74120156
Medical Device Problem Codes Biocompatibility (2886); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Metal Related Pathology (4530); Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 03/21/2022
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Complaint reference number: (b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, after a bhr system had been implanted on an unspecified date, the plaintiff experienced an unspecified adverse event that was addressed via revision surgery on (b)(6) 2022.No additional information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that a revision surgery was performed due to an unspecified adverse event.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment have not been returned for evaluation.As no device part and batch numbers were provided for investigation, a complaint history review, manufacturing record review, or definite escalation actions review could not be performed.A review of the product¿s instructions for use was not possible due to limited information about the details of the event and device.Without basic part details or an alleged failure mode, no risk file review is possible.No further actions are required at this time.If more information is received, this investigation will be reopened.The requested supporting clinical documentation has not been provided; therefore, there were no clinical factors found which would have contributed to the unspecified complications.With the limited information provided, the patient impact beyond the reported revision cannot be determined.Based on the information provided, further investigation of the reported complaint cannot be carried out and remains inconclusive.A definitive root cause cannot be determined.Based on the limited information provided we are unable to speculate on specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault.Should the devices or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective and preventative actions is not indicated.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3, h6.It was reported that a revision surgery was performed due to elevated metal ion levels and pain.As of today, the implanted devices, all of which were used in treatment have not been returned for evaluation.Without a definitive batch number, a complete review of the historical complaints data cannot be performed for the device.A review of historical complaints data was performed using the part numbers and the reported failure modes to evaluate patterns of repeated failures or defects.Similar complaints have been identified for the cup and the head, and this failure will continue to be monitored.As no device batch numbers were provided for investigation, manufacturing record review could not be performed.If more information is received, this investigation will be reopened.The review of the most recent ifu found adequate warnings and precautions in relation to the alleged failure modes.A risk management review was performed.The alleged failure modes and associated risks have been anticipated within the risk file and the anticipated risk level is still adequate.No further actions are required at this time.A review of historic escalation actions related to the products and similar complaint events was performed.Following the review, no prior applicable escalation actions were identified.The available medical documents were reviewed.Although elevated metal ions were reported, no laboratory values or laboratory reports were provided.With the limited information provided the clinical root cause of the reported metallosis cannot be definitively confirmed.However, the implantation angle of his acetabular cup in slightly less anteversion than his bony acetabulum and/or revision finding of significant retroversion of his acetabulum due to his previous acetabular osteotomy cannot be ruled out as possible contributing factors to his reported pain and clinical status.It cannot be concluded the reported metallosis was associated with a mal performance of the implant or implant failure.The patient impact beyond the pain, revision, and expected transient post-op convalescence period cannot be determined.Based on the information provided, further investigation of the reported complaint cannot be carried out and remains inconclusive.A definitive root cause cannot be determined.Specific factors known to contribute to the alleged fault are excessive physical activity levels, unreasonable stress on replacement system, excessive patient weight, trauma to the joint replacement, loosening of components may increase production of wear particles and accelerate damage to the bone.Should the devices or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective and preventative actions is not indicated.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: a2, b5, b7, d1, d4, d6a, d10, h6 b3, d6b, g2.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, after a bhr resurfacing system had been implanted on patient right hip on (b)(6) 2015 due to advanced degenerative arthritis, the plaintiff experienced revision surgery on (b)(6) 2022 due to elevated metal ion levels and pain.During the revision, evidence of metallosis in the capsule and small pseutotumor medially were found.Femoral head and cup were explanted and exchanged for competitor devices.Patient awoken from anesthesia and transferred to recovery room in stable condition.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACETLR CUP HAP 56MM W/ IMPTR
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/METAL, RESURFACING
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house, spa park
leamington spa warwickshire CV31 3HL
UK  CV31 3HL
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS LTD
aurora house, spa park
leamington spa warwickshire CV31 3HL
UK   CV31 3HL
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key16935783
Report Number3005975929-2023-00075
Device Sequence Number5730917
Product Code NXT
UDI-Device Identifier03596010502599
UDI-Public03596010502599
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P040033
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2015
Device Explanted Year2022
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Consumer,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 07/14/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number74120156
Device Catalogue Number74120156
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/23/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/06/2023
06/21/2023
07/12/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/15/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/08/2023
06/22/2023
07/14/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
74121150/RESURFACING FEMORAL HEAD 50MM
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age43 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-