• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC IRELAND ENDURANT II ILIAC STENT GRAFT; SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC IRELAND ENDURANT II ILIAC STENT GRAFT; SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TR Back to Search Results
Model Number ETEW2828C82E
Medical Device Problem Codes Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Positioning Problem (3009)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Perforation of Vessels (2135)
Date of Event 05/15/2023
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event or Problem Description
An endurant ii stent graft system was implanted in a patient for the endovascular treatment of a 55m abdominal aortic ulcer.It was reported during the index procedure, the physician tried to advance the 28x28x82 through the femoral artery that was exposed via cutdown.The device would not advance even with rotation.The physician removed the delivery system over the wire however, upon removal noticed the tip was missing.Fluoroscopy to the patient's right groin was performed and it showed the tip was lodged in the patient's iliac artery.The iliac artery ruptured when attempting to remove the tip.The rupture was repaired and the tip was removed surgically.A replacement endurant stent was then successfully implanted.Per the physician the cause was due to oversizing.No additional clinical sequelae were reported and the patient is fine.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis conclusion: images received from the account show the shelf carton label and confirm the customer facing number (cfn) and serial number as reported.Another image captures the front end of the device and confirms the taper tip detachment.The graft is visible underneath the graft cover.The tip detachment is confirmed through review of the images received.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis conclusion: the device returned with the external slider in the home position.Deformation was visible along the graft cover.A severe kink was noted on the graft cover at the stent stop.The taper tip was detached from the device and rotational marks were visible on the surface of the nose cone.A section of the spiral member was protruding from the tip.The spiral member was severely deformed and unravelled at the detached site.The graft was slowly deployed, and it was noted that the deformed spiral member had snagged on a stent ring.A kink and separation were observed at the spiral member at the same site the kink was noted on the graft cover at the stent stop.The reported taper tip detachment was confirmed during analysis.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis conclusion: the tip detachment was likely confirmed; however, the cause of the event could not be determined and the iliac artery rupture could not be assessed from the single non-contrast still image provided.Lack of pre-implant ct's did not allow for assessment of the pre-implant anatomy.It is unknown from the film provided at what point the tapered tip detached from the rest of the delivery system.Procedural angiograms showing attempts to advance the delivery system within the artery and also during the removal of the device from the patient was not provided for further analysis of the event.It is possible that the size of the delivery system relative to the access vessel diameter and the diameter of the previously implanted stent may have contributed to the reported events, but this could not be confirmed from the single still image returned.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENDURANT II ILIAC STENT GRAFT
Common Device Name
SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
EI 
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC IRELAND
parkmore business park west
galway
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key16937472
Report Number9612164-2023-02039
Device Sequence Number20291087
Product Code MIH
UDI-Device Identifier00613994991416
UDI-Public00613994991416
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNJ
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P100021
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/23/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/12/2025
Device Model NumberETEW2828C82E
Device Catalogue NumberETEW2828C82E
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/15/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/15/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/17/2023
05/17/2023
06/08/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/16/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/17/2023
06/08/2023
06/23/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/13/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age82 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-