|
As the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The return of the sample is pending.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.H10: d4 (expiration date: 01/2026).Section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure, the balloon was allegedly ruptured.It was further reported that the balloon mushroomed when attempting to remove it from the sheath and forced to remove the sheath.Reportedly, upsize in sheath was necessary, because the removal of the balloon caused a bigger hole in the vessel.However, there is no information provided regarding additional intervention or medication to treat the hole in the vessel.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
It was reported that during an angioplasty procedure, the pta balloon was allegedly pressurized above the rated burst pressure by the user and it ruptured.It was further reported the balloon allegedly mushroomed when attempting to remove it from the sheath.Reportedly, due to the mushroom, the user was forced to remove the sheath and upsize the new sheath to the remove the balloon which caused a bigger hole in the vessel.However, there is no information provided regarding additional intervention or medication to treat the hole in the vessel.There was no reported patient injury.
|
|
H10: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed and this lot met all release criteria.There was nothing found to indicate there was a manufacturing related cause for this event.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.The investigation is confirmed for the reported incorrect use of the device, as the user stated in the reported event details they inflated the balloon above rated burst pressure and are aware of their incorrect use of the device.However the investigation is inconclusive for the reported rupture, difficulty to remove, and deformed balloon as the device was not returned and no objective evidence was provided to confirm these failures.As per the reported event details, the user knowingly over inflated the balloon causing the balloon rupture.Therefore the likely cause of the reported balloon rupture is the incorrect use of the device.It is also possible the reported rupture may have led to the issues with the deformed balloon material and difficulty removing from the sheath.However the definitive root cause could not be determined as the device and no evidence were provided for review.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documentation (e.G., procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, nursing guide, and unit label) did not find any product labeling inadequacy.Per the reported information, the user inflated the balloon above the rated burst pressure.This contradicts the instructions for use in the vaccess instruction for use under warnings, step 4: "do not exceed the rbp recommended for this device.Balloon rupture may occur if the rbp rating is exceeded.To prevent over pressurization, use of a pressure monitoring device is recommended." h10: b5, d4 (expiration date: 01/2026), g3, h6 (device, method).H11: h6 (result, conclusion).H11: section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : device not returned.
|