|
MENTOR TEXAS MENTOR MEMORYGEL XTRA BREAST IMPLANT; PROSTHESIS, BREAST, NONINFLATABLE, INTERNAL, SILICONE GEL-FILLED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
SMPX685 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Capsular Contracture (1761)
|
| Date of Event |
04/25/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
At the time of this report, mentor has received no information regarding explantation or an expected explantation date.It is unknown at this time if the device will be made available for return.As a result, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: n/a.Mentor is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which mentor has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, mentor, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mentor, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If certain information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a 59-year old caucasian female patient underwent breast augmentation revision with a 685cc mentor memorygel xtra breast implant on the left breast.Post-operatively, the patient suffered left breast capsular contracture (baker grade iii).At the time of this report, mentor has received no information regarding explantation or an expected explantation date.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On september 12, 2023, the mentor failure analysis lab received the device for evaluation.On september 14, 2023, the product investigation was completed.Device investigation summary: the product was returned to mentor for evaluation.Mentor conducted a visual inspection of the returned device.During visual evaluation no apparent damage or visual anomalies were observed on the smooth mod + prof xtra 685cc returned device.Mentor concluded that the capsular contracture in the patient´s breast was the result of the body´s individual physiological response to the implantation of a foreign object in soft tissue.Capsular contracture is a known complication associated with these devices and is referenced in our current product insert data sheet.The american society of plastic surgeons recommends and encourages member surgeons to always submit breast implants, capsule, and effusion to pathology for examination.A second product was received (lot-9555950).No adverse events were reported for this concomitant (contralateral) device, therefore no further analysis is required.It should be noted that as part of mentor¿s quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Since no malfunction was observed during the investigation, capa activity was not required.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On august 31, 2023, mentor received additional information indicating that the patient had undergone breast implant removal and replacement surgery on (b)(6) 2023.The patient's capsular contracture progressed to baker grade iv during removal surgery.The patient's implants were replaced with the following: 560cc mentor memorygel xtra breast implant catalog: smpx560 and 685cc mentor memorygel xtra breast implant catalog: smpx685.Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: capsular contracture.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|