• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV 2.0 WITH SHUNTASSISTANT 2.0 30; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV 2.0 WITH SHUNTASSISTANT 2.0 30; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number FX644T
Medical Device Problem Codes Mechanical Problem (1384); Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Hydrocephalus (3272)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a progav 2.0 shunt system (#fx644t) was implanted during a procedure performed on an unknown date.According to the complainant, the shunt system was believed to be operated in overdrainage and had adjustment difficulties.The patient underwent a revision procedure.The complaint device was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.No patient complications were reported as a result of the revision procedure.Age: 4 years 10 month.Height: 10 centimeters (cm).Weight: 9 kilograms (kg).Gender: male.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation: visual inspection: during the investigation, deposits on the device were determined.Permeability test: a permeability test has indicated that the progav 2.0 valve has a blockage and that the shuntassistant 2.0 is permeable.Computer controlled test: to investigate the claim of over- drainage, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.The valves are tested in both the horizontal as well as the vertical positions.The results show that the shuntassistant 2.0 operates within the accepted tolerance in the vertical position.Due to the non-permeability of the progav 2.0, a computer-controlled test is not applicable.Adjustment test: the progav 2.0 was tested and is not adjustable.Braking force and brake function test: the brake functionality test has shown that the brake function is operational; however, the braking force cannot be measured due to the non-adjustability of the valve.Internal inspection: after dismantling of the valves, deposits were found in both valves.Results: based on our investigation results, we can determine a blockage and a non-adjustability in the progav 2.0 valve at the time of the investigation.The determined deposits can be named as the cause for the functional deviations.Proteins in the cerebrospinal fluid can influence the function temporarily and are known side effects in hydrocephalus therapy.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The shunt system met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.No further regulatory actions are required from our point of view.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROGAV 2.0 WITH SHUNTASSISTANT 2.0 30
Common Device Name
HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM  14469
Manufacturer (Section G)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
Manufacturer Contact
joerg knebel
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
MDR Report Key16989388
Report Number3004721439-2023-00136
Device Sequence Number15192746
Product Code JXG
UDI-Device Identifier04041906502027
UDI-Public4041906502027
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
K190174
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 05/23/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/09/2026
Device Model NumberFX644T
Device Catalogue NumberFX644T
Device Lot Number20051744
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/24/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/24/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/23/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/11/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age4 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight19 KG
-
-