|
Investigation: visual inspection: the following observations were made during the visual inspection: no abnormalities.Permeability test: the test showed that the shuntassistant 2.0 is permeable.Computer control test: the computer control test showed the opening pressure of the shuntassistant 2.0, at a reference flow rate of 20 ml/h in a vertical position of the valve, to be 24.93 cmh2o.This is not within the specified tolerance of 30 +4/-2 cmh2o.An applied pressure of 30 cmh2o, with the device in the vertical position is expected to have a resultant pressure of 30 +4/-2 cmh2o.The measurement showed a tendency to an accelerated outflow.Internal inspection of product: in order to verify whether the investigated valve was compromised by the known risks of hydrocephalus therapy, e.G.By a build-up of natural substances (protein, blood, or tissue particles) in the cerebrospinal fluid, the valve is finally opened with a special tool.After dismantling of the valve, no deposits were found in shuntassistant 2.0.When opening valves, it is possible to see a large part of the interior, but there are also areas that cannot be inspected and where there may be deposits that can affect the function of the valve.For more detailed visibility for possible deposits, the shuntassistant 2.0 were submerged in a coloring solution.After the coloring deposits were visible.Results: for the sake of thoroughness and transparency, we would like to point out that a permeability test was already carried out after the revision at the hospital.Based on our investigation results, we have determined that there was an accelerated outflow in the valve at the time of our investigation.Detected deposits could be the cause of the accelerated outflow.Existing deposits in the csf can temporarily impair the function of the valve and is described as concomitant symptoms in hydrocephalus therapy.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The valve met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.
|