| Model Number |
ZKB00 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Sections a-4 patient weight and a-5 patient ethnicity and race: unknown as information was not provided.Section b-3: date of event: unknown as information was not provided.The best estimate date is between (b)(6) 2023 and (b)(6) 2023 (iol implant and explant dates).Section h3-other (81): the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts were made to contact the customer account requesting additional information regarding complaint however, to date no response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that an intraocular lens (iol) was implanted into the patient¿s ocular sinister (left eye).The iol was explanted in a secondary surgical procedure due to lens malfunction and replaced with a non-johnson & johnson surgical vision lens.There was no patient injury, no medical intervention, and no surgical intervention.Patient status post-lens exchange was reported as fine.No further information is available.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: section d-9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d-9: device date returned to manufacturer: 18-may-2023.Section h-3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: the complaint lens was received inside of a bag.Visual inspection under magnification revealed that the complaint lens was received cut in half and with a haptic detached.The lens was cleaned and, no further issues were observed with the lens.The remaining haptic was measured for haptic width and haptic thickness.The lens was within specification for both measurements.Complaint issue "dc-lens damage" was not identified during photo and product evaluation.The observed "dc-haptic damaged" is similar to the reported complaint issue (complaint coding may have been the result of the customer being unfamiliar with coding definitions per amo-04-d024).However, based on the complaint investigation results the complaint issue could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Conclusion: based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.A relationship between the device and the reported incident could not be determined.No product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.Please note that the information reported in sections d-2 (common device name), section g-1 (manufacturer contact e-mail), and section h-6 health effect ¿ (clinical code and medical device problem code) is information that remains unchanged from the initial emdr report.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|