• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NEDERLAND B.V. INGENIA 3.0T

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NEDERLAND B.V. INGENIA 3.0T Back to Search Results
Model Number INGENIA 3.0T
Medical Device Problem Codes Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Partial thickness (Second Degree) Burn (2694)
Date of Event 05/18/2023
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Philips has started an investigation.A follow up will be send when the investigation has been completed.
 
Event or Problem Description
Philips received a report that a patient suffered a large 2nd degree burn on the right elbow after an mr examination that was performed while the patient was under anesthesia.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: there is no indication of a malfunction of the mr system or coils used that could have contributed to the incident.The observed reddening and blister can be explained by close contact with the bore wall.Even though it was mentioned that padding was used, taking into consideration the patient's size and the duration of the examination it is likely that the padding used was insufficient and/or that the padding moved during the examination.This reported burn is considered a second degree burn and was determined to be a serious injury.Treatment to right arm blister was to clean the area and pat dry and betadine solution was used.No further medical treatment was required.Contributing factors.The patient was obese.The thermoregulation of obese patients is known to be impaired.The risk of rf energy-related injuries is higher in patients with impaired thermoregulation.The patient was anesthetized.The thermoregulation of anesthetized patients is impacted.The circulation of the limbs is lower than normal.So, the heat dissipation of the limbs is less due to the anesthesia.3 scans with high sar values (> 2 w/kg) were executed in a short period of time, allowing no cool down time for the patient.The total administered specific energy dose of 6.38 kj/kg exceeded the recommended limit of 2.0 kj/kg for patients with impaired thermoregulation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INGENIA 3.0T
Common Device Name
INGENIA 3.0T
Manufacturer (Section D)
PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NEDERLAND B.V.
veenpluis 6
best 5684 PC
NL  5684 PC
Manufacturer (Section G)
PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NEDERLAND B.V.
veenpluis 6
best 5684 PC
NL   5684 PC
Manufacturer Contact
dusty leppert
222 jacobs street
cambridge, MA 02141
MDR Report Key16990276
Report Number3003768277-2023-03122
Device Sequence Number17923628
Product Code LNH
UDI-Device Identifier00884838009813
UDI-Public884838009813
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTX
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K110151
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberINGENIA 3.0T
Device Catalogue Number781377
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/18/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/18/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/24/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date07/18/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient Age44 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight129 KG
-
-