|
ENCORE MEDICAL L.P LINER, ACETABULAR, FMP, HOODED, 10D 32XMP8 CM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
432-32-208 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
04/28/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional reporting on this event will be provided as a supplemental report to this document as soon as it becomes available.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Revision surgery - due to unknown reason.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
See d4 and h4.The reason for this revision surgery, the agent reported "(stem and head removed and replaced with stryker system, along with our old liner removed and placed a new liner to match the new head size.We were not told why the revision was taking place.Male 63 yrs)." the previous surgery and the surgery detailed in this event occurred 19.5 years apart.Note: the primary dticket did not include a stem and head, therefore most likely the stem and head that was removed were not djo (encore) components.This evaluation is limited in scope as the item(s) associated with this investigation was not returned to djo surgical - austin for examination.The surgery was completed as intended and without incident.If additional information regarding the reported event is submitted at a future date, this investigation will be re-evaluated.There was no information submitted with this complaint about any patient activities, accidents, or medical contraindications that may have contributed to the reported event.There were no findings during this evaluation that indicate that the reported device(s) was defective.The surgeon performed this procedure to remedy the patient's condition.No further action is deemed necessary.A review of the device history record(s) show that the reported component(s) used in the previous surgery, when released for use, met design and manufacturing requirements.There were no nonconforming material reports associated with the product(s) that may have contributed to the reported event.The device(s) was verified to have gone through an acceptable sterilization process and was within its expiration date at the time of the previous surgery.Customer complaint history of the reported device(s) showed no present trends or on-going issues that are needing a review.The root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery due to unknown reason.No information was submitted with the complaint regarding pre-existing conditions of the patient or any activities the patient was involved in that may have contributed to the event.There are multiple factors that may contribute to an event that are outside of the control of djo surgical.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|