|
EXACTECH, INC. LOGIC CR TIB INSERT STD, SZ 2, 9MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
LOGIC CR TIB INSERT STD, SZ 2, 9MM |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Naturally Worn (2988)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Failure of Implant (1924); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
04/24/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information, including the product investigation, will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported, approximately four years post initial left tka, the 72 y/o female patient had a revision due to the poly degradation issues.Patient's liner was revised.Patient revised to exactech device.There was no breakage of device or surgical delay/prolongation.Patient was last known to be in stable condition following the event.Images received.The device is not available for evaluation as it was discarded by hospital.No other patient information/medical history reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
After further review of additional information received the following sections g3, g6, h2, h3 and h6 have been updated accordingly.(h3) the revision reported was likely the result of ¿poly degradation issues¿ as stated in the experience report.However, this cannot be confirmed as the device was not available for evaluation and the provided images of the tibial do not show signs of wear/delamination.A contributing factor to the revision may have been inclusion of the implanted polyethylene component in the packaging recall.The most probable root cause associated with the reported event of ¿prosthesis wear¿ is associated with material damage to a surface, usually involving progressive loss or displacement of material, due to relative motion between that surface and a contacting substance or substances.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay corrected information.The following sections were corrected: d8, h6 - health effect - clinical code, component code, type of investigation, investigation findings and h11.The revision reported was likely the result of ¿poly degradation issues¿ as stated in the experience report.However, this cannot be confirmed as the device was not available for evaluation and the provided images of the tibial do not show signs of wear/delamination.A contributing factor to the revision may have been inclusion of the implanted polyethylene component in the packaging recall.The most probable root cause associated with the reported event of ¿prosthesis wear¿ is associated with material damage to a surface, usually involving progressive loss or displacement of material, due to relative motion between that surface and a contacting substance or substances.If any further information is obtained that would change or alter any information provided, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|