• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECTON DICKINSON MEDICAL (SINGAPORE) BD CATHENA¿ SAFETY IV CATHETER WITH WINGS BD MULTIGUARD¿ TECHNOLOGY; INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECTON DICKINSON MEDICAL (SINGAPORE) BD CATHENA¿ SAFETY IV CATHETER WITH WINGS BD MULTIGUARD¿ TECHNOLOGY; INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number 386813
Medical Device Problem Code Defective Component (2292)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Vasculitis (2004)
Date of Event 04/30/2023
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
D.4.Medical device expiration date: unknown.H.3.A device evaluation is anticipated but has not yet begun.Upon completion of the investigation, a supplemental report will be filed.H.4.Device manufacture date: unknown.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the bd cathena¿ safety iv catheter with wings bd multiguard¿ technology was damaged and caused a skin lesion on the puncture site when removed.As a result, the patient developed phlebitis, but no further information was provided.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: "problem of placing new catheters on peripheral venous lines.Aggressive catheters on the skin in people with a precarious venous capital with or without corticoids.A skin lesion has been observed at the puncture site with venitis when the catheter is removed.Recurrent problem in several patients.Greater risk of infection with and without venous thrombosis.".
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H6: investigation summary no photos or samples were received by our quality team for evaluation therefore the failure mode could not be verified, and the root cause could not be determined.A device history record could not be evaluated as the lot number is unknown.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the bd cathena¿ safety iv catheter with wings bd multiguard¿ technology was damaged and caused a skin lesion on the puncture site when removed.As a result, the patient developed phlebitis, but no further information was provided.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: "problem of placing new catheters on peripheral venous lines.Aggressive catheters on the skin in people with a precarious venous capital with or without corticoids.A skin lesion has been observed at the puncture site with venitis when the catheter is removed.Recurrent problem in several patients.Greater risk of infection with and without venous thrombosis.".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BD CATHENA¿ SAFETY IV CATHETER WITH WINGS BD MULTIGUARD¿ TECHNOLOGY
Common Device Name
INTRAVASCULAR CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECTON DICKINSON MEDICAL (SINGAPORE)
30 tuas avenue 2
singapore
Manufacturer (Section G)
BECTON DICKINSON MEDICAL (SINGAPORE)
30 tuas avenue 2
singapore
Manufacturer Contact
phillip emmert
9450 south state street
sandy, UT 84070
8448235433
MDR Report Key17025757
Report Number8041187-2023-00238
Device Sequence Number15340807
Product Code FOZ
UDI-Device Identifier00382903868131
UDI-Public00382903868131
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryFR
PMA/510(K) Number
K201717
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/12/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Other
Device Model Number386813
Device Catalogue Number386813
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/05/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/12/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date05/30/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/26/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-