|
MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL HD ARTHROSCOPE/SINUSCOPE, EP, 1.9MM, 30 DEG, 60MM (STORZ STYLE); RIGID ENDOSCOPE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
242048 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Display or Visual Feedback Problem (1184)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
05/15/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported by the sales rep in south korea that preoperatively to an unknown procedure on (b)(6) 2023, it was observed that the lens on the hd arthroscope/sinuscope, ep, 1.9mm, 30 deg, 60mm (storz style) device were broken.It was unknown if and how the procedure was completed.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10: additional narrative: udi#: (b)(4).E3: reporter is a j&j sales representative.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary the complaint device has not been returned, therefore unavailable for a physical evaluation.However, a photo was provided.Upon visual inspection of the photo, it appeared that the image on camera cloudy/blurred.This complaint can be confirmed.The certificate of analysis and certificate of compliance for this manufactured lot is attached to this complaint file.There were no non-conformances or deviations for this lot on the coc.According with the visual inspection of the photo, this complaint can be confirmed.The device is required for testing to determine a root cause for the issue experienced by the customer, the photo provided does not contain enough evidence to determine why the customer experienced the failure, hands on analysis should provide the required evidence to provide a root cause.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to monitor additional complaint information for potential safety signals through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.H10 additional narrative: investigation summary: the complaint device is not being returned, it was by the customer, therefore unavailable for a physical evaluation.Since the complaint device was not returned, we cannot determine a root cause for the reported failure.If additional information is received in the future, we will reopen the complaint and perform the investigation as appropriate.The complaint device is not being returned, therefore unavailable for a physical evaluation.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.Device history review a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number and no non-conformances were identified.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|