| Model Number |
CD-B620LA |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Mechanical Problem (1384); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
05/03/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The subject device was returned for evaluation, however, the device evaluation has not yet been started.Supplemental report(s) will be submitted should any relevant new information is available and or received.Investigation is ongoing.This report will be supplemented accordingly following investigation.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp) procedure, while healing papilla bleeding, the device (bicoag probe) hemostasis tip fell off.Another bicoag probe was obtained, tried and the same issue happened.Bicoag settings were bisoftcoag 40,effect 1.There was no patient harm or injury reported, fully covered stent where used to heal the bleeding.No user injury reported.This event includes two reports addressing the two devices (bicoag probe) reported in the event.Report with patient identifier (b)(6) (bicoag probe cd-b620la lot kr248637 ).Report with patient identifier (b)(6) (bicoag cd-b620la lot kr238330 ).This report being submitted is for patient identifier (b)(6) (bicoag probe cd-b620la lot kr248637 ).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being supplemented based on additional information obtained and response to follow up.Follow up response , the following information were provided: the tip of the probe fell into the patient, as seen in the x-ray transillumination.Given that the patient's procedure was already prolonged due to leakage, the doctor decided to leave the probe tip in the intestine and not attempt to remove it again.The bleeding was stopped with a covering stent.The device-related issues resulted in a prolonged procedure duration of approximately 20-30 minutes as the bleeding could not be stopped immediately.Additionally, follow up communication noted that customer confirmed that there was only (b)(4) devices broke.The customer just clarified, one broke on the table and one broke inside the patient.It was unknown which device broke inside the patient and which one broke on the table.The two broken device were addressed and filed on the initial report under patient identifier (b)(6) ( lot kr238330) and identifier (b)(6) (lot kr248637).This supplemental report is for patient identifier (b)(6) (lot kr248637).Investigation is ongoing.This report will be supplemented accordingly following investigation.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.The e2, e3 and g2 fields were corrected based on information available at the time of the initial submission.The device was returned to olympus for inspection, and the customer's reportable malfunction was confirmed.A review of the device history record found no deviations that could have caused or contributed to the reported issue.It has been less than 1 year since the subject device was manufactured.Based on the results of the investigation, the tip experienced unexpected torque or excessive force during use, causing the adhesive to weaken and resulting in the tip falling out.The event can be prevented by following the instructions for use which state: - keep the device tip in sight during use.Inadvertent activation or movement of the device outside the field of vision may result in patient injury.- do not use the device if resistance to insertion is encountered.Reduce the angle or lower the forceps elevator of the endoscope until the device passes smoothly." olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|