|
It was reported that during a da vinci-assisted total benign hysterectomy surgical procedure, the customer noted the vessel sealer (vs) instrument stopped working and was not recognized by the system.The vs worked for the beginning of the case then stopped working.The customer informed the instrument was not removed prior to it having the function error.There was no reported injury or harm.Intuitive surgical, inc.(isi) followed up with the robotic coordinator and obtained the following additional information: the customer confirmed they opened two different vessel sealer (vs) that did not work, then lost power on the surgeon side console (ssc), and the surgeon opted to convert to laparoscopic procedure.It was noted that the erbe integrated electrosurgical unit (iesu) generator was not recognizing the instrument after previously working fine.The nurse did not perform troubleshooting with technical support as they were called after the case.The customer informed that the system was inspected prior to use and no issues were noted during the system setup.It was noted the procedure was in progress about 45 to 50 minutes when the issue occurred.The customer attempted to reseat the instrument.The customer stated the surgeon believed the cause of the reported event was due to the vs instruments and iesu malfunction.Both vs instruments were inspected prior to use, and nothing out of the ordinary was observed.At the time of the instrument use, the surgeon was attempting to seal and cut the uterine suspension tissue; however, the iesu intermittently stated the instrument was not recognized.The customer noted that the vs instrument worked as normal for the beginning of the case.Intermittent errors would flash on the iesu machine and then would disappear.It was confirmed that during the sealing sequence an audible signal was heard when the pedal was pressed, and fast audible tones were heard indicating the seal cycle was complete.The target tissue according to the customer was under tension during the sealing/cutting process, and the vessel was not greater than 7mm in diameter.No vessel calcification was observed nor had the tissue been exposed to any radiation or chemotherapy.Tissue effect was observed during the sealing cycle.Additionally, both vs instrument did not have contact with any staples, clips, or other material objects, nor were the instrument jaws immersed in a liquid or contaminated by carbonization.No unexpected bleeding was noted and no post-operative complications were experienced.Both vs instrument will be returning for analysis.No video/image was available for review.The customer confirmed the procedure was completed laparoscopically with no patient injury or harm.This medical device report is being submitted to capture the second vessel sealer instrument malfunction reported by the customer.Patient identifier (b)(6) captures the first vessel sealer instrument.
|