| Model Number |
39202 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Break (1069); Positioning Failure (1158); Difficult to Advance (2920)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
05/10/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported, that shaft break occurred.Vascular access was obtained via the ipsilateral side.The 100% stenosed target lesion was located in the severely tortuous, and moderately calcified iliac artery.After a 0.014-inch guidewire was crossed, a 10x100x75 epic vascular stent was advanced for treatment.Meandering was very strong, and resistance was felt in advancing the stent into the lesion.An attempt was made to deploy the stent, but failed even after turning the wheel at about 20 ticks.The device was removed, but it was observed, that the outer shaft came off.The procedure was completed with a different device.There were no patient complications nor injuries reported.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that shaft break occurred.Vascular access was obtained via the ipsilateral side.The 100% stenosed target lesion was located in the severely tortuous and moderately calcified iliac artery.After a 0.014-inch guidewire was crossed, a 10x100x75 epic vascular stent was advanced for treatment.Meandering was very strong, and resistance was felt in advancing the stent into the lesion.An attempt was made to deploy the stent but failed even after turning the wheel at about 20 ticks.The device was removed, but it was observed that the outer shaft came off.The procedure was completed with a different device.There were no patient complications nor injuries reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device evaluated by mfr.: epic vascular 10x100x75 was received for analysis.The device was received with the stent fully constrained in the correct position on the delivery system.No issues were noted with the stent.The stent could not be deployed due to extensive damage to the sheath of the device.A visual and tactile examination identified no issues with the tip of the device.A visual and tactile examination found the outer sheath of the device to be completely separated at the floating bumper.This type of damage is consistent with excessive tensile force being applied to the device.A visual and tactile examination found the inner shaft of the device to be severely kinked at more than one location.The inner sheath was also found to have severe stretching damage proximal of the outer sheath separation.This type of damage is consistent with excessive tensile force being applied to the device.No damage or issues were noted with the handle of the device.This concludes the product analysis.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|