• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CARL ZEISS MEDITEC PRODUCTION LLC CT LUCIA 602

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CARL ZEISS MEDITEC PRODUCTION LLC CT LUCIA 602 Back to Search Results
Model Number 602
Medical Device Problem Code Use of Device Problem (1670)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Visual Impairment (2138)
Date of Event 05/16/2023
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a ct lucia 602 lens was partially implanted when the haptic twisted.The doctor was able to remove the lens without patient injury.No adverse events or clinically significant delay in procedure reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device has not been sent back, thus, a proper device analysis could not be completed.Based on the information provided, the risk assessment for the ct lucia product and based on our experience and other complaints that have already been resolved we have determined that the following factors may have cause or contributed to the damaged haptic is but is not limited to: · loading strategy, · lens placement technique, · accessory device support, · poor handling during folding and inserting.Risk assessment has been reviewed within the technical file for 3-piece lenses risk assessment identifies failed injection or damaged haptics to potentially be caused by the lens improperly loaded such that the optic is bent, or haptics are under compression.This is seen as a reasonably foreseeable misuse that may result in extended surgery because of damage to lens/injector and replacement is required.This is seen as a minor severity damage that may result in temporary injury or disability which requires no additional surgical intervention the likelihood of occurrence is estimated to be occasional the resulting risk is deemed acceptable.The device history records were reviewed and there were no non-conformities or deviations noted during the manufacturing of the lens that would have caused or contributed to the nature of this complaint.Additionally, our lenses are 100% inspected before they leave our manufacturing site.Therefore, we are confident that the lens was processed per standard operating procedures and inspections and met all criteria for release.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CT LUCIA 602
Common Device Name
CT LUCIA 602
Manufacturer (Section D)
CARL ZEISS MEDITEC PRODUCTION LLC
1040 s vintage ave. bld. a
ontario CA 91761
Manufacturer (Section G)
CARL ZEISS MEDITEC PRODUCTION LLC
1040 s vintage ave. bld. a
ontario CA 91761
Manufacturer Contact
manjaya hegde
5300 central parkway
dublin, CA 94568
9252164697
MDR Report Key17076070
Report Number3010126268-2023-00077
Device Sequence Number6775750
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier00843045100966
UDI-Public(01)00843045100966(17)260531
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTN
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P10016-S008
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2023
Device Explanted Year2023
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 06/06/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/31/2026
Device Model Number602
Device Catalogue Number003500-0050-675
Device Lot Number3S210649
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/16/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/06/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/08/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-