• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. GII PS HI FLEX ISRT SZ 5-6 11; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. GII PS HI FLEX ISRT SZ 5-6 11; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL Back to Search Results
Model Number 71421516
Medical Device Problem Code Fracture (1260)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Joint Laxity (4526)
Date of Event 05/26/2023
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10.Internal reference number: h10: internal complaint reference.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, after tka surgery had been performed 15 years ago, the patient experienced 'clunking' noise and instability in the knee.This adverse event was solved by a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2023, in which it was found that the gii ps hi flex isrt sz 5-6 11 had been severed and the implant was in two bits.The insert was replaced with a new constrained ps tibial insert and locked into place after some range of motion.The knee was washed out extensively and closed up.Health status of the patient is unknown.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3, h6: the device was not returned for evaluation.However, the photographs were reviewed, and revealed that the post of the device fractured.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, per case details, the patient had a left revision total knee arthroplasty approximately 15 years post implantation due to clunking and instability in the knee.Reportedly, it was noted intraoperatively that the post of the insert was broken off.The two provided photos confirm the breakage.However, as of the date of this medical investigation, the requested clinical documentation has not been provided for evaluation.It was noted via e-mail correspondence within the attachments that no further patient information is available.Therefore, the clinical root cause of the reported event cannot be definitely concluded.The patient impact beyond the revision surgery could not be determined based on the limited information provided.No further clinical assessment can be rendered at this time.A review of the production order did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history revealed similar events for the listed device over the previous 12 months, but no similar events for the batch based on the historical data, this failure mode will be monitored for future complaints for any necessary corrective actions.A review of the instructions for use documents for knee systems revealed that break of implant as a result of strenuous activity or trauma has been identified as warnings and precautions.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.According with material specification, the quality and manufacture of polyethylene as rod and plate shall be controlled.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include patient anatomy, abnormal loading of limb, excessive forces and/or traumatic injury.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GII PS HI FLEX ISRT SZ 5-6 11
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key17121919
Report Number1020279-2023-01300
Device Sequence Number17901999
Product Code JWH
UDI-Device Identifier03596010492333
UDI-Public03596010492333
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryAS
PMA/510(K) Number
K032295
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Explanted Year2023
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 07/17/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/28/2019
Device Model Number71421516
Device Catalogue Number71421516
Device Lot Number09DT30468
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/26/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer07/14/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/13/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date07/17/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured04/30/2009
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-