• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN PROTEGE RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM; STENT, CAROTID

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN PROTEGE RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM; STENT, CAROTID Back to Search Results
Model Number SECX-8-6-40-135
Medical Device Problem Codes Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 06/05/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
Physician was attempting to use a protege rx self-expanding stent along with a 6fr non-medtronic (penumbra neuron max) sheath and a 6mm spider fx guidewire/embolic protection device during treatment of 35mm plaque lesion in the patients mid right common carotid artery.Little vessel calcification and little vessel tortuosity.Artery diameter is reported as 7mm.Lesion exhibited 85% stenosis.There was no damage noted to packaging (i.E.Shelf carton, hoop/tray).There were no issues noted when removing the device from the hoop/tray.Device was prepped per the ifu with no issues identified.It is reported the top part of stent deployment completely unscrewed and physician couldn't get the stent to deploy.No resistance was encountered during delivery to lesion.The device did not pass through a previously deployed stent.The lesion was pre-dilated with a 5mm x 20 pre-dilation device.The device did not detach, no intervention required for removal of the device and device was safely removed from patient.No stent struts were exposed/visible on device removal.Physician removed the stent that wouldn't deploy and inserted a new stent of the same size to complete procedure.No patient injury reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis the device was returned with the touhy-borst loose.The device was returned with a gap at the distal end of the device the stent confirmed as 40mm a 20cc water filled syringe was used to flush the device, the device flushed by the guidewire lumen space only.The y connector was observed to have biologics present after the flush attempt a 0.014¿ guidewire was loaded through the guidewire lumen and advanced the entire length and exited the guidewire port, the device was loaded into a deployment fixture the stent could not be deployed fully with a maximum peak force of 4.85lbs the deployed portion of the stent, which measured approx.7mm was examined and dried biologics were noted on the stent, dried biologics were also observed in the lumen of the outer blue sheath medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROTEGE RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM
Common Device Name
STENT, CAROTID
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN
4600 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN
4600 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key17125130
Report Number2183870-2023-00218
Device Sequence Number15074988
Product Code NIM
UDI-Device Identifier00821684038703
UDI-Public00821684038703
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTN
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P060001
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 07/24/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/11/2024
Device Model NumberSECX-8-6-40-135
Device Catalogue NumberSECX-8-6-40-135
Device Lot NumberB430522
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/05/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer07/05/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/14/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date07/24/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/12/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age76 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight93 KG
-
-