• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV WITH SHUNTASSISTANT 30; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV WITH SHUNTASSISTANT 30; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number FV415T
Medical Device Problem Codes Mechanical Problem (1384); Infusion or Flow Problem (2964)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Hydrocephalus (3272)
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a progav shuntsystem (#fv415t) was implanted during a procedure performed on unknown date.According to the complainant, the shunt showed an under-drainage and adjustment difficulties.The patient underwent a revision procedure.The complaint device has returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.No patient complications were reported as a result of the revision procedure.Age: 4 years.Weight: 13 kilograms (kg).Height: 100 centimeters (cm).Gender: female.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Visual inspection: during the visual inspection a deformation of the outer housing of the progav could be determined.The measurement of the plane parallelism could confirm that with a value of -0,030 mm - outside tolerance (0 ± 0.02 mm).Permeability test: a permeability test has indicated that the progav is permeable while the shuntassistant has a blockage.Computer controlled test: to investigate the claim of under-drainage, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.The valves are tested in both the horizontal as well as the vertical positions.The results show that the progav is operating not within the accepted tolerance in the horizontal position.Accelerated outflow was determined during our measurement.Due to the non-permeability of the shuntsassistant, a measurement on the test bench could not be performed.Adjustment test: the progav was tested and is not adjustable.Braking force and brake function test: the brake functionality test has shown that the brake function is operational, however the braking force cannot be measured due to the non-adjustability of the valve.Internal inspection: after dismantling of the valves, deposits were found in both valves.To make the proteins / deposits in the shunt system more visible, they were colored using a staining solution.Results: based on our investigation results, we can determine, at the time of our investigation, accelerated outflow on the progav, a blockage on the shuntassistant, and deposits on both valves.The cause for the malfunctions mentioned could be the deposits found.Proteins in the cerebrospinal fluid can influence the function temporarily and are known side effects in hydrocephalus therapy.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The shunt system met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.No further regulatory actions are required from our point of view.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROGAV WITH SHUNTASSISTANT 30
Common Device Name
HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM  14469
Manufacturer (Section G)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
Manufacturer Contact
joerg knebel
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM   14469
MDR Report Key17147351
Report Number3004721439-2023-00175
Device Sequence Number14889133
Product Code JXG
UDI-Device Identifier04041906132125
UDI-Public4041906132125
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
K103003
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 06/16/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/22/2025
Device Model NumberFV415T
Device Catalogue NumberFV415T
Device Lot Number20045718
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/19/2023
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/19/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/16/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/23/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age4 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight13 KG
-
-