|
The subject device is not available for evaluation, as it remains implanted in the patient.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
|
|
It was learned through implant patient registry that a patient with a 23mm 2700 aortic valve underwent a valve-in-valve procedure after an implant duration of 4 years, 11 months due to unknown reasons.The procedure was performed with a 23mm 9750tfx transcatheter valve.The patient was in stable condition post procedure.Edwards lifesciences maintains an implant patient registry.This registry is a patient tracking mechanism for serialized edwards implantable devices (bioprosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings), rather than a true post-market surveillance registry.Through the registry, edwards is notified when these devices are implanted.In addition, patient and/or device status may be reported to the registry via the implantation data cards.The information is received from various sources (e.G.Surgeon, hospital, and patient family members) and is not received in the form of a conventional customer complaint.The information reported may or may not be related to the edwards device.
|
|
Updated sections: b5, b7, d4 expiration date, g3, g6, h4, h6 component code, health effect - clinical code, device code(s), type of investigation, investigation findings, and investigation conclusions.The device history record was reviewed and shows that this device met all manufacturing specifications for product release prior to distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.Regurgitation which develops progressively over time can be due to a number of issues including patient related factors or structural valve deterioration.Structural valve deterioration (svd) can, and typically does, lead to chronic central leaks over a period of time.Svd is the most common reason for bioprosthesis explant and encompasses multiple failure modes, including calcification, noncalcific degeneration, dehiscence, cusp thickening or fibrosis, or a combination of these.Such failure modes may occur singularly or concomitantly.Tissue degeneration-related structural deterioration, either calcific or non-calcific, are common chronic failure modes for this type of bioprosthetic heart valve.Operational mechanical stress and biological factors are generally believed to be the major contributors to the non-calcific bioprosthetic tissue degeneration.Through further investigation, it was determined that the root cause of this event was most likely due to patient related factors.
|
|
It was learned through implant patient registry that a patient with a 23mm 2700 aortic valve underwent a valve-in-valve procedure after an implant duration of 4 years, 11 months due to degenerative valve with severe aortic insufficiency.The patient presented with sob, and chronic diastolic heart failure, nyha class iii-iv.The procedure was performed successfully with a 23mm 9750tfx transcatheter valve with no immediate complications.The patient was in stable condition post procedure.The patient was discharge to home on pod#1.
|