• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT AORTIC PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT AORTIC PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS; REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE Back to Search Results
Model Number 2700
Medical Device Problem Codes Degraded (1153); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190); Intravalvular regurgitation (4068)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Heart Failure/Congestive Heart Failure (4446); Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 03/23/2023
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The subject device is not available for evaluation, as it remains implanted in the patient.The investigation is still in progress; therefore, a conclusion has yet to be established.A supplemental report will be submitted accordingly upon investigation completion.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was learned through implant patient registry that a patient with a 23mm 2700 aortic valve underwent a valve-in-valve procedure after an implant duration of 4 years, 11 months due to unknown reasons.The procedure was performed with a 23mm 9750tfx transcatheter valve.The patient was in stable condition post procedure.Edwards lifesciences maintains an implant patient registry.This registry is a patient tracking mechanism for serialized edwards implantable devices (bioprosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings), rather than a true post-market surveillance registry.Through the registry, edwards is notified when these devices are implanted.In addition, patient and/or device status may be reported to the registry via the implantation data cards.The information is received from various sources (e.G.Surgeon, hospital, and patient family members) and is not received in the form of a conventional customer complaint.The information reported may or may not be related to the edwards device.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Updated sections: b5, b7, d4 expiration date, g3, g6, h4, h6 component code, health effect - clinical code, device code(s), type of investigation, investigation findings, and investigation conclusions.The device history record was reviewed and shows that this device met all manufacturing specifications for product release prior to distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.Regurgitation which develops progressively over time can be due to a number of issues including patient related factors or structural valve deterioration.Structural valve deterioration (svd) can, and typically does, lead to chronic central leaks over a period of time.Svd is the most common reason for bioprosthesis explant and encompasses multiple failure modes, including calcification, noncalcific degeneration, dehiscence, cusp thickening or fibrosis, or a combination of these.Such failure modes may occur singularly or concomitantly.Tissue degeneration-related structural deterioration, either calcific or non-calcific, are common chronic failure modes for this type of bioprosthetic heart valve.Operational mechanical stress and biological factors are generally believed to be the major contributors to the non-calcific bioprosthetic tissue degeneration.Through further investigation, it was determined that the root cause of this event was most likely due to patient related factors.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was learned through implant patient registry that a patient with a 23mm 2700 aortic valve underwent a valve-in-valve procedure after an implant duration of 4 years, 11 months due to degenerative valve with severe aortic insufficiency.The patient presented with sob, and chronic diastolic heart failure, nyha class iii-iv.The procedure was performed successfully with a 23mm 9750tfx transcatheter valve with no immediate complications.The patient was in stable condition post procedure.The patient was discharge to home on pod#1.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PERIMOUNT AORTIC PERICARDIAL BIOPROSTHESIS
Common Device Name
REPLACEMENT HEART-VALVE
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
saurav singh
1 edwards way
mle fl2- office m2013
irvine, CA 92614
9492506615
MDR Report Key17148518
Report Number2015691-2023-13979
Device Sequence Number12160081
Product Code DYE
UDI-Device Identifier00690103021608
UDI-Public(01)00690103021608(17)210807
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTX
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P860057
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2018
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/04/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/07/2021
Device Model Number2700
Device Catalogue Number270023MM
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/23/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer07/31/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/16/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/04/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/08/2017
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization; Life Threatening; Required Intervention;
Patient Age83 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-