|
Section d6a: if implanted, give date: not applicable, as there is no indication that the lens was implanted section d6b: if explanted, give date: not applicable, as there is no indication that the lens was implanted.Section h3: other 81: the device was not returned for evaluation as the lens remain implanted in the eye.Therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record, complaint trending, and risk documentation for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|
|
Section d9: device available for evaluation: yes.Section d9: returned to manufacturer on: 6/23/2023.Section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection under magnification revealed that the complaint lens was received cut in half and with a bent haptic.The lens was cleaned, and no additional issues were observed.Based on the return condition of the lens, no further product evaluation could be performed.Conclusion: the complaint issue of dc-haptic damaged was identified during product evaluation; however, based on the complaint investigation results the complaint issue could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.The other issues observed during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to a manufacturing or design issue.As per complaint investigation results, the product was released within specifications.The complaint issue reported could not be confirmed and no product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
|