• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK LLC US GRASPER - GRABER; SUTURE/NEEDLE PASSER, REUSABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK LLC US GRASPER - GRABER; SUTURE/NEEDLE PASSER, REUSABLE Back to Search Results
Model Number 270120
Medical Device Problem Code Difficult to Open or Close (2921)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 06/07/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported by the affiliate in japan that during an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair procedure on (b)(6) 2023, it was observed that the movements on the grasper - graber device were not linked to the opening and closing of the forceps.It was unknown how the procedure was completed.There were no adverse patient consequences nor surgical delay reported.No additional information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Udi: (b)(4).D4: the expiration date is currently unavailable.E3: reporter is a j&j employee.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary :the product was returned to mitek for evaluation.Mitek then conducted visual inspection of device received.Visually, the device had wear marks.It was observed that when the trigger of the device was pulled, the jaws would not actuate open/close consistently.The upper jaw was loose.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device 19a01, and no non-conformances were identified.Based on the visual results, this complaint can be confirmed.This type of failure has been attributed to wear and tear as well as rough use, since the repeated excess force applied when a large amount of tissue is being grasped which cause a potential to break; also, the age of the device causing damage in the device.Other than this possibility, cannot be discerned at this point.As per ifu, inspect for damage before using.End of useful instrument life is generally determined by wear or damage from handling or surgical use.Inspect instruments between uses to verify proper functioning.Between uses, lubricate moving parts with a water-soluble lubricant in accordance with the manufacturer¿s instructions.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, in depuy synthes mitek, additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.The actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GRASPER - GRABER
Common Device Name
SUTURE/NEEDLE PASSER, REUSABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer (Section G)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
kate karberg
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
3035526892
MDR Report Key17163570
Report Number1221934-2023-02486
Device Sequence Number5757651
Product Code LXH
UDI-Device Identifier10886705013968
UDI-Public10886705013968
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number270120
Device Catalogue Number270120
Device Lot Number19A01
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/07/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer07/10/2023
07/29/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/20/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date07/11/2023
07/31/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/14/2019
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-