MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CARL ZEISS MEDITEC PRODUCTION LLC CT LUCIA LENS; INTRAOCULAR LENSE

Model Number	602
Medical Device Problem Codes	Optical Decentration (1360); Off-Label Use (1494); Use of Device Problem (1670)
Health Effect - Clinical Code	Visual Impairment (2138)
Date of Event	02/19/2023
Type of Reportable Event	Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
Dr.(b)(6) implanted the lens fine on (b)(6) 2023.Post op day 1, (b)(6) 2023, the lens looked fine and centered.The patient returned day three, (b)(6) 2023, and the lens had decentered.At the time, the doctor assumed the haptic had slipped out of the sclera.On (b)(6) 2023, the doctor decided to explant the lens and replace it with another lens.The doctor found the haptic still positioned properly in the sclera.The problem was that the haptic had slipped out of the optic on one side.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device is not being sent back thus a proper device analysis could not be completed nor the reported issue confirmed.The customer stated that there was no damage noted to the device during preparation for use, thus indicating a product quality issue did not contribute to the reported issue.Additionally, it was stated by the customer that they are using the yamane technique to implant the lenses.This technique induces a larger amount of force while trying to position the haptics in the scleral tunnel.Our lenses are intended to be implanted in the capsular bag.Thus, the lens was being used off-label.Based on the information provided, the risk assessment for the lucia product and based on our experience and other complaints that have already been resolved we have determined that the following factor may have cause or contributed to the damaged haptic is but is not limited to: loading strategy, lens placement technique, accessory device support and poor handling during folding and inserting.The device history records were reviewed and there were no non-conformities or deviations noted during the manufacturing of the lens that would have caused or contributed to the nature of this complaint.Our lenses are 100% inspected before they leave our manufacturing site.Therefore, we are confident that the lens was processed per standard operating procedures and inspections and met all criteria for release.

• Brand Name: CT LUCIA LENS
• Common Device Name: INTRAOCULAR LENSE
• Manufacturer (Section D): CARL ZEISS MEDITEC PRODUCTION LLC; 1040 s. vintage ave. bld. a; ontario CA 91761
• Manufacturer (Section G): CARL ZEISS MEDITEC PRODUCTION LLC; 1040 s. vintage ave. bld. a; ontario CA 91761
• Manufacturer Contact: manjaya hegde ; 5300 central parkway; dublin, CA 94568 ; 9252164697
• MDR Report Key: 17167970
• Report Number: 3010126268-2023-00083
• Device Sequence Number: 5578175
• Product Code: HQL
• UDI-Device Identifier: 00843045100997
• UDI-Public: (01)00843045100997(17)270831
• Combination Product (Y/N): N
• Initial Reporter State: TX
• Initial Reporter Country: US
• PMA/510(K) Number: P10016-S008
• Number of Events Summarized: 1
• Summary Report (Y/N): N
• Device Implanted Year: 2023
• Device Explanted Year: 2023
• Serviced by Third Party (Y/N): N
• Reporter Type: Manufacturer
• Report Source: Health Professional,User Facility
• Initial Reporter Occupation: Physician
• Type of Report: Initial
• Report Date (Section B): 06/20/2023

1 Device was Involved in the Event

1 Patient was Involved in the Event

• Is this an Adverse Event Report?: Yes
• Is this a Product Problem Report?: No
• Operator of Device: Health Professional
• Device Model Number: 602
• Device Catalogue Number: 003500-0050-678
• Device Lot Number: N/A
• Was Device Available for Evaluation?: No
• Is the Reporter a Health Professional?: Yes
• Type of Report(Section G): Thirty-Day
• Initial Date Received by Manufacturer: 05/30/2023
• Initial Report FDA Received Date: 06/20/2023
• Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N): Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
• Date Device Manufactured: 09/11/2022
• Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N): Yes
• Is This a Single-Use Device that was Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N): No
• Usage of Device: Initial
• Patient Sequence Number: 1
• Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event: Required Intervention
• Patient Sex: Unknown