• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG PROTEGO SD 60/16; ICD LEAD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG PROTEGO SD 60/16; ICD LEAD Back to Search Results
Model Number 399408
Medical Device Problem Code Ambient Noise Problem (2877)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 06/15/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
This lead was explanted due to noise.No adverse patient events were reported.Should additional information become available, this file will be updated.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device is currently not available for analysis.No conclusion can be drawn at this time.No additional information is available at the moment.The file is closed.The investigation will be re-opened should additional data become available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Upon receipt, the lead under complaint was found cut 12.5 cm distal to the df4 connector pin into two segments.An extraction aid was found on the distal fragment, it is reasonable to assume that the lead was cut during the surgery.The analysis showed that the insulation was found rubbed through approximately 11 cm proximal to the lead tip, which is assumed to be the root cause of the reported oversensing.Based on the characteristics of this damage, it is reasonable to assume that the lead had been subject to severe mechanical stress in the implanted state.Significant lead motion in the area of the tricuspid valve and interaction with atypical tissues should be taken into consideration.Furthermore, the shock coils were found deformed and the fixation helix bent, these damages probably resulted from the extraction procedure due to tensile stress.Prior to the analysis of the device, the quality documents accompanying the manufacturing process for this device were re-investigated.All production steps were performed accordingly, and in particular the final acceptance test proved the device functions to be as specified.In conclusion, the analysis did not reveal any sign of a material or manufacturing problem.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROTEGO SD 60/16
Common Device Name
ICD LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG
woermannkehre 1
berlin 12359
Manufacturer Contact
6024 jean road
lake oswego, OR 97035
8772459800
MDR Report Key17169861
Report Number1028232-2023-03111
Device Sequence Number20599420
Product Code NVY
UDI-Device Identifier04035479136093
UDI-Public(01)04035479136093(17)170131
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980023
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2015
Device Explanted Year2023
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 10/27/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/31/2017
Device Model Number399408
Device Catalogue NumberSEE MODEL NO.
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/20/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/22/2023
10/26/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/21/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/22/2023
10/27/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/28/2015
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization;
Patient Age78 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-