| Model Number |
02-012-44-2011 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Unstable (1667); Naturally Worn (2988); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Joint Laxity (4526); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
12/15/2022
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Pending investigation.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
As reported via legal documentation the patient had a left knee replacement on (b)(6) 2012.Approximately 10 years and 1 month after the initial procedure the patient had a left knee revision on (b)(6) 2022.There is no other patient demographic or medical history available.There is no information on the surgical procedure or patient outcome.There is no device return.There are no photos or other images of the device provided.No additional information is available.Revision op report (b)(6) 2022 postoperative diagnosis: instability of prosthetic knee.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10.H6.Investigation results - the logic tibia implant psc insert device with serial number (b)(6) is confirmed to have been packaged in a vacuum bag that does not contain evoh.The cause of the patient¿s instability and subsequent revision cannot be conclusively determined; however, it is most likely related to the patient¿s underlying condition as associated with the interaction between the implanted device and the patient due to patient illness, unique anatomy, or other condition that impacts the performance of the device.The patient has bilateral knee replacements.These devices are used for treatment not diagnosis.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H6: corrected the following: health effect - clinical code, medical device problem code, component code, type of investigation.Manufacturer narrative updated: the reason for the revision reported cannot be confirmed from the information provided but may be the result of prosthesis wear and instability or due to inclusion of the polyethylene in the packaging recall.Additionally, the devices were implanted for over ten years prior to the reported failure(s).However, the reported prosthesis wear and instability could not be confirmed and potential contributions of user or patient-related considerations to the event could not be assessed as the devices were not available for evaluation and no images, radiographs, or relevant clinical information was provided.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|