| Model Number |
2024-46-010 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
06/15/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the instrument locking cap was broken off one end.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary - instrument locking cap has broken off one end (lot gm0808 not validated ) please refer to image the product damage documented in this pc has been identified during loan kit inspection, by the loan kit technician.The event date and alert date are the date that the inspection took place.There is no surgeon, procedure, or patient details available.The device associated with this report was returned to depuy synthes for evaluation.Visual examination of the device found the end cap component fractured at the center of the pin that secures the cap to the shaft, the pin was not returned.The observed condition of the device was consistent with a random component failure that may have been caused by exposure to unintended forces.The sigma unicondylar surgical technique guide (dsus/jrc/1114/0582) states "use the tibial osteotome to gently remove the bone from the keel slot.Do not impact forcefully as this can cause a break of the posterior tibia".A dimensional inspection was not performed as it is not applicable to the complaint condition.A functional test was not performed as it is not applicable to complaint condition.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the sigma hp uni ap keel osteotome would contribute to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, the potential cause is traced to unintended use error, and it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot - a date code was provided, which indicates that the device was manufactured on ((b)(6) 2008).A manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed since a valid finished good lot number was not provided for this device.Corrected h3.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint (b)(4).Investigation summary: the device was not returned to depuy synthes for evaluation.However, photo(s) were provided for review.Review of the provided photo(s) confirms, that locking cap of instrument has broken.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot: a device history record (dhr) review or manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not possible, because the date code provided is not a finished goods lot number.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|