|
DEPUY SYNTHES PRODUCTS LLC PERFORATOR DRIVER,60:1 RATIO; DRILL, SURGICAL, ENT (ELECTRIC OR PNEUMATIC) INCLUDING HANDPIECE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
CSR60-G1 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Device Slipped (1584); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
06/14/2023
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported from canada that prior to a craniotomy surgical procedure, it was observed that the spring of the perforated driver device was coming out along with another piece.During further follow up it was reported that the spring was completely out of the device and was loose.There were no delays in the surgical procedure.Another device was used to complete the procedure.There was patient involvement.There were no injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted accordingly.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.D9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once the investigation has been completed, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.Udi:(b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Additional narrative: the actual device was returned for evaluation.During repair, an evaluation was performed and it was determined that the device fell apart (was unattached).The device also failed pretests for visual assessment and engagement assessment.The reported condition of the device being loose was not confirmed.The assignable root cause was traced to component failure due to normal wear.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|