• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM RED 72 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SYSTEM RED 72 REPERFUSION CATHETER; NRY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RED72KIT
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 05/28/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure in the internal carotid artery (ica) using a penumbra system red 72 reperfusion catheter (red72), a velocity delivery microcatheter (velocity), and a benchmark bmx96 access system (bmx96).During the procedure, while attempting to make the first pass using the red72, the physician noticed that air was leaking at the proximal end, under the hub.Subsequently, the physician applied pressure on the hub and the amount of air was reduced.Therefore, the red72 was removed.The procedure was completed using a penumbra system red 68 reperfusion catheter (red68), the same velocity, and the same bmx96.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.H3 other text : placeholder.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned red72 confirmed a leak under the strain relief and revealed a fracture at the location of the leak.If the proximal end of the red72 is forcefully manipulated during advancement, damage such as a kink and subsequent fracture may occur.This damage likely contributed to the reported leak.Further evaluation revealed a kink on the distal shaft.This damage is likely incidental to the complaint, and likely occurred during packaging the device for return.Penumbra products are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SYSTEM RED 72 REPERFUSION CATHETER
Common Device Name
NRY
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key17214621
Report Number3005168196-2023-00301
Device Sequence Number6232641
Product Code NRY
UDI-Device Identifier00815948023932
UDI-Public815948023932
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCA
PMA/510(K) Number
K211654
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/09/2023
Report Date (Section F) 01/01/2005
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/08/2026
Device Catalogue NumberRED72KIT
Device Lot NumberH00002347
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/01/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer07/10/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/28/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/09/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/09/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age79 YR
Patient SexMale
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
-
-