• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON INC. VCL CT BRD VIO 8X18IN 2-0 S/A SH CR; SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON INC. VCL CT BRD VIO 8X18IN 2-0 S/A SH CR; SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC Back to Search Results
Model Number J775D
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).H6 component code: g07002.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Could you please clarify if the patient suffered from any signs or consequences due to the issue? please provide more information is it possible to clarify if the needle fall into the patient? if yes, was the needle piece removed from the patient during the same procedure? were x-rays taken to locate the needle? was there any patient consequence or injury? what is the patient¿s current health status and condition? was any other tissue damaged as a result of searching the needle? what measures were taken to retrieved the broken piece? is there a second surgery schedule to search the needle? please provide more information please perform and document the follow up attempt for product return.Please document the shipment tracking number in notes or rmao sections.Please provide the source or name of person providing answers to follow-up questions (not the person relaying/submitting answers to loc or chu).A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot, and no non-conformances were identified.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a patient underwent an unknown procedure on an unknown date and suture was used.During the procedure, the needle tip was fragile.The needle tip broke easily, could not be located, and the wound was closed with the possibility of remaining in the patient's body.No adverse patient consequences were reported.Additional information was requested.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Date sent to the fda: 9/7/2023.H3 investigational summary: the product received for analysis was identified as product code j775d.Visual inspection and metallurgical analysis were performed on the returned product.A fracture was observed at the tip of the needle.One side of the needle was received, the mating fracture surface was not provided for this evaluation.The needle was noted with marks that appears to be by surgical instrument.A scanning electron microscope was used to examine the fracture surface and surrounding area of the needle.The fracture surfaces were examined in multiple locations to determine the fracture mode.The evaluation of the sample revealed the fracture was composed of microvoid coalescence, which is evidence of a ductile fracture mode.This was a ductile fracture.The evidence of this examination indicates that the breakage occurred at the tip of the needle during use due to tensile overload.There is no evidence of any material flaw or defect that would cause premature failure.In order to avoid this kind of damage grasp the needle in an area one-third (1/3) to one-half (1/2) of the distance from the attachment end to the point.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Date sent to the fda: 7/19/2023.Additional information was requested, the following was obtained: could you please clarify if the patient suffered from any signs or consequences due to the issue? please provide more information: we have not received any information from the attending physician that any problems occurred after the operation.The product was used for subcutaneous suturing in lumbar fusion surgery.Is it possible to clarify if the needle fall into the patient? if yes, no.However, we received a comment from the attending physician that the possibility of falling the needle piece into the patient body is low.And, we received a comment from the attending physician that the needle might have broken because i was holding the needle badly.Was the needle piece removed from the patient during the same procedure? it is unknown if the needle fell into the patient's body.However, we received a comment from the attending physician that the possibility of falling the needle piece into the patient's body is low.Were x-rays taken to locate the needle? no.Was there any patient consequence or injury? no.What is the patient¿s current health status and condition? we have not received any information from the attending physician that any problems occurred after the operation.Was any other tissue damaged as a result of searching the needle? no.What measures were taken to retrieved the broken piece? the attending physician visually checked the inside of the patient's body, but could not find the broken piece of the needle at the sama procedure.Is there a second surgery schedule to search the needle? please provide more information: no.Please perform and document the follow up attempt for product return.Please document the shipment tracking number in notes or rmao sections: (b)(4).Please provide the source or name of person providing answers to follow-up questions (not the person relaying/submitting answers to loc or chu): (b)(6).Vigilance safety, staff.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Date sent to the fda: 8/14/2023.H6 component code: g07002 no device problem found.H3 investigational summary: the product was returned to ethicon for evaluation.Visual inspection was conducted on the returned device.The returned sample revealed that it was received, eight unopened samples that pertain to product code j775d.In order to evaluate the condition of the returned samples, the packets were opened.The swage and attachment area were noted to be as expected.The tip and body of the needles were examined under magnification and no defects or needle breakage were found.In addition, the samples were tested by resistance test to needle and met the requirements.As part of the ethicon quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
VCL CT BRD VIO 8X18IN 2-0 S/A SH CR
Common Device Name
SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON INC.
1000 route 202
raritan NJ 08869
Manufacturer (Section G)
ETHICON INC.-JUAREZ
avenida de las torres 7125
col salvacar
cuidad juarez
MX  
Manufacturer Contact
elba bello
1000 route 202
raritan, NJ 08869
9083863534
MDR Report Key17217985
Report Number2210968-2023-04682
Device Sequence Number2985330
Product Code GAM
UDI-Device Identifier10705031042933
UDI-Public10705031042933
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K022269
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 09/07/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberJ775D
Device Catalogue NumberJ775D
Device Lot NumberSGMKSH
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/08/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/30/2023
07/21/2023
08/16/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/28/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date07/19/2023
08/14/2023
09/07/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/19/2022
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-