• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS AG POLARSTEM STEM STD TI/HA 1 NON-CEM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, UNCEMENTED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS AG POLARSTEM STEM STD TI/HA 1 NON-CEM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, UNCEMENTED Back to Search Results
Model Number 75100464
Medical Device Problem Code Fracture (1260)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Bone Fracture(s) (1870); Failure of Implant (1924)
Date of Event 06/13/2023
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, after a thr surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2022, the patient experienced breakage of the polarstem stem std ti/ha 1 non-cem.This adverse event was treated by a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2023, in which the polarstem stem std ti / ha 1 non-cem was exchanged.Patient's current health status is in a good general condition.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section h10: it was reported that, after a revision total hip replacement surgery, the patient experienced breakage of the polarstem stem std ti/ha 1 non-cem.This adverse event was treated by a revision surgery in which a polarstem stem std ti/ha 1 non-cem was exchanged.Patient's current health status is in a good general condition.The complaint device used in treatment was returned for investigation.A visual evaluation of the device was conducted, and it was concluded that the stem is fractured on the distal side.The area around the proximal thread appears to be fine but heavy scratches can be seen around the fracture area.It is suspected, that the scratches arose while removing the implant from the body.An assessment of the material properties was conducted and it was concluded that about three quarter of the fracture surface show fatigue striations, indicating that the crack propagated by fatigue.Crack initiation was found to be at the lateral side of the fractured stem in the distal region.The residual fracture surface showed characteristic of ductile overload.No pores or inclusions, which could have initiated or enhanced crack growth, could be observed on the fracture surface.In the area of assumed crack initiation, no scratches have been found but could be hidden under the coating.A review of the production documentation did not detect any deviation that could have contributed to the reported failure mode.The review of historical complaints for the alleged device revealed no additional similar complaints reported for the same batch, and no additional similar complaints for the same product number over the past 12 months with similar failure mode.A review of past corrective actions was performed.No further escalation is required.A review of the risk management documentation verifies the failure mode, occurrence and severity of the reported issue.The instructions for use states "implant component fracture" as a ¿potential medical device problems¿, and "overweight patient, obesity" is also indicated as a "risk factor" which can influence the success of the operation resulting from a hip arthroplasty.With the limited information provided, the clinical root cause of the pain and loosening polar shaft cannot be definitively concluded; however, the patients¿ very severe obesity cannot be ruled out as a possible contributing factor to her pain and clinical status.The patient impact beyond the pain, revision, and expected transient post-op convalescence period cannot be determined.There is no indication that the reported device failed to meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.The root cause of the reported event remains undetermined.Specific factors known to contribute to the alleged event are excessive physical activity levels, unreasonable stress on replacement system, excessive patient weight and trauma to the joint replacement.The need for further actions is not indicated.Nevertheless, smith+nephew will continue to monitor this device for similar issues.The returned device will be retained.Internal complaint reference number: (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POLARSTEM STEM STD TI/HA 1 NON-CEM
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, UNCEMENTED
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS AG
schachenallee 29
aarau CH-50 00
SZ  CH-5000
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS AG
schachenallee 29
aarau CH-50 00
SZ   CH-5000
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key17232612
Report Number9613369-2023-00167
Device Sequence Number15218196
Product Code LWJ
UDI-Device Identifier07611996118551
UDI-Public07611996118551
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2022
Device Explanted Year2023
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/08/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number75100464
Device Catalogue Number75100464
Device Lot NumberB2018933
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/15/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/08/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/29/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/08/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/23/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age61 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight122 KG
-
-