|
It was reported that a progav 2.0 shuntsystem (#fx603t) was implanted during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2023.According to the complainant, the shunt showed an under-drainage.The patient underwent a revision procedure performed on may 28, 2023.The complaint device has returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.No patient complications were reported as a result of the revision procedure.Age: 58 years weight: unknown height: unknown gender: male.
|
|
Visual inspection: during the investigation, some bloody residue tissues on the device was determined.Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that all components are permeable.During the permeability test bloody liquid were flushed out.Computer controlled test: to investigate the claim of under-drainage, the opening pressure is measured using a miethke computer controlled testing apparatus which simulates a cerebrospinal fluid flow.The valves are tested in both the horizontal as well as the vertical positions.The results show that the progav 2.0 is operating within the accepted tolerance in the horizontal position.The shuntassistant 2.0 is operating not within the specified tolerances in the vertical position.An accelerated outflow of shuntassistant 2.0 could be determined.Adjustment test: the progav 2.0 was tested and is adjustable to all specified pressures.Braking force and brake function test: the brake functionality test has shown that the brake function is fully operational and the braking force is within the given tolerances.Internal inspection: after dismantling of the valves, deposits were found in both valves.To make the proteins / deposits in the shunt system more visible, they were colored using a staining solution.Results: in advance, we would like to point out that the product sent in was not submerged in liquid at the time of delivery.The testing of dry valves is only of limited value.The product properties can be influenced by dry residues of cerebrospinal fluid or blood.Despite this, we have examined the valve.Based on our investigation results, we can determine, at the time of our investigation, an accelerated outflow on the shunassistant 2.0.The cause of the accelerated outflow may be deposits.When opening the valves, it is possible to see a large part of the interior, but there are areas that are beyond inspection where deposits can be found that can impair the function of the valve.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The shunt system met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.No further regulatory actions are required from our point of view.
|