• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number MI1200 SYNCHRONY
Medical Device Problem Code Migration (4003)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Failure of Implant (1924)
Date of Event 06/19/2023
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device has not been explanted.If it should be explanted, it should be returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.When available, a device failure analysis will be submitted as a follow up report.
 
Event or Problem Description
Imaging has reportedly shown a partial migration of the electrode out of cochlea.A programmming and device investigation appointment is arranged for (b)(6) 2023.The surgeon is considering repositioning / re-implantation.
 
Event or Problem Description
The user was re-implanted.Per explantation report there were approx.8 extra-cochlear channels.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: device investigations did not reveal any device defect or problem which is expected to have been present whilst implanted.Mechanical damages found during investigation are attributable to the removal surgery.This finding was expected, because according to the recipient report the device was explanted for a post-operative active electrode migration out of the cochlea.In addition a complete insertion was not achieved at implantation surgery.Reportedly 7 channels were left extra-cochlear.This is a final report.
 
Event or Problem Description
Imaging has reportedly shown a partial migration of the electrode out of cochlea.A revision surgery is scheduled for (b)(6) 2023.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: according to the information received, the device was not providing benefit to the recipient due to a post-operative active electrode migration out of the cochlea.In addition a complete insertion was not achieved at implantation surgery.Reportedly 7 channels were left extra-cochlear.A revision surgery is planned for (b)(6) 2023.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MED-EL MAESTRO COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM
Common Device Name
COCHLEAR IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MED-EL ELEKTROMEDIZINISCHE GERAETE GMBH
innsbruck
AU 
Manufacturer Contact
laura simonotti
fuerstenweg 77a
innsbruck 6020
AU   6020
57788
MDR Report Key17236616
Report Number9710014-2023-00552
Device Sequence Number5754993
Product Code MCM
UDI-Device Identifier09008737094089
UDI-Public(01)09008737094089
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUK
PMA/510(K) Number
P000025
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2017
Device Explanted Year2023
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 02/05/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date07/28/2019
Device Model NumberMI1200 SYNCHRONY
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/19/2023
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/19/2023
06/19/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/30/2023
Supplement Report FDA Received Date09/01/2023
02/05/2024
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/28/2016
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age6 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-