|
The manufacturer was contacted in reference to the voluntary field safety notice / recall notification related to the sound abatement foam in certain cpap, bipap, and mechanical ventilator devices.The manufacturer received information alleging an issue related to a cpap device's sound abatement foam.The patient has alleged to seeing particles in the air path.There was no report of serious patient harm or injury.There was no medical intervention required by the patient.The manufacturer's investigation is ongoing.A follow-up report will be submitted when the manufacturer's investigation is complete.
|
|
The manufacturer was previously contacted in reference to the voluntary field safety notice / recall notification related to the sound abatement foam in certain cpap, bipap, and mechanical ventilator devices.The manufacturer received information alleging an issue related to a cpap device's sound abatement foam.The patient has alleged to seeing particles in the air path.There was no report of serious patient harm or injury.There was no medical intervention required by the patient.The updated describe event or problem will be: a device was returned to manufacturer's service center for evaluation.During the evaluation of the device at the manufacturer's service center, the device was visually inspected and no visible foam particles were observed.The device was corrected.At this time, no further investigation can be performed.If any additional information is received, a follow up report will be filed.In box d: product udi, operator of the device, operator of device - other device serviced by 3rdp?, device available for eval?, device available for eval?, date returned to mfg are updated in this follow-up.In box g: date received by mfg is updated in this follow-up.In box h: device avail.For eval? (rfb), device evaluated by mfg?, evaluation method code grid, evaluation results code grid, component code grid, conclusion code grid are updated in this follow-up.
|